Peter Sloman

@pjsloman.bsky.social

There's a damaging tendency in British politics to treat party crises, leadership changes, and other forms of instability as failures of politics, rather than part of the political process. (I know it's not only a British phenomenon, but our majoritarian political culture makes it worse.)

Will Cooling@willcooling.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I think the use of the word psychodrama is starting to obscure more than it reveals. Yes it's ridiculous to be about to have our 7th PM in 10 years, but each PM ran into a problem that they couldn't resolve. Getting rid of them really was necessary to solve the immediate problem and move on

On the Conservatives' £47bn of spending cuts, this feels like a very early stage in the Parliament to be setting out specifics, but I suppose the point is to allow Badenoch and Stride to oppose the tax rises coming in the November budget.

The Starmer/Burnham struggle within Labour has quite big implications for the Lib Dems. Starmer’s old Labour right positioning gives the LDs acres of political space but is hostile to cooperation; the two parties' social and geographical bases are quite distinct. 1/2

At this stage, the closest parallel to the Starmer government is Tony Abbott in 2013-15: won a landslide on a 'change' platform, tightly bound by pledges, damaged by unpopular budget decisions and given little credit for promises delivered. Starmer and Reeves will hope to find a better way out.

I'm looking forward to taking part in the rebooted Liberal Summer School on 12 August - joining Stuart White, Frances Foley and Vicky Pryce to talk about economics and empowerment

John Stuart Mill Institute@jsmillinstitute.bsky.social · last yr.

We're thrilled to welcome @pjsloman.bsky.social to our online Summer School. Peter will explore the economic policy of the Liberal Party, & its commitment to worker co-ownership. What lessons can we learn for a world of tech giants & widening inequality? Sign up below: share.google/lAuP00z6RFpg...

Peter Sloman

Welsh Labour's decision to introduce closed-list PR for the Senedd looks more foolish with every week that passes. STV would have allowed Labour to benefit from incumbents' personal votes and attract anti-Reform preferences

It's great to see this paper by Ewan Robertson out in Political Studies - a rigorous and deeply-researched analysis of the drivers of in-work benefit reforms

Political Studies@polstudies.bsky.social · last yr.

Do ideas or political demand drive welfare reform? @ewanrobo.bsky.social shows how ideational power, not voter pressure, shaped in-work benefits in the UK and France. Read OPEN ACCESS: buff.ly/EGt2uCw @polstudiesassoc.bsky.social @uoypolitics.bsky.social @sagepub.com #polsky #polsci

The 1906, 1964 and 1997 governments all took several years to work out a coherent social security policy; some might ask if Wilson ever got there. If the Starmer government is serious about reducing poverty, this is a natural point for a reset and a proper review of the social safety-net.

What would an anti-oligarchic, republican economy look like? UBI? Wealth tax? Workplace democracy? Strong trade unions? Investment democracy? I explore a radical republican economics in my new book, 'The Wealth of Freedom', which is now out online. academic.oup.com/book/60075

The Wealth of Freedom: Radical Republican Political Economy

Abstract. What is an economy for? The republican tradition in political thought offers a compelling way of exploring this question. The economy is for the

academic.oup.com

I'm thrilled to have been published in Past & Present. Diving into the fractious politics of rich-country macroeconomics after 1973, I use the neglected case of protectionist Keynesians to rethink what happened, and why. I highlight statecraft, geopolitics, and Maier's 'territoriality'. (1/2)

Bild
Past and Present@pastpresentsoc.bsky.social · last yr.

New on advance access "The Political Crisis of British Keynesianism, 1973–1983" by @colmpm.bsky.social (‪@qmpoliticsir.bsky.social‬) #OpenAccess doi.org/10.1093/past...