Lukas Röseler
@aufdroeseler.bsky.social
Open Scholarship, Repetition Research, Research on Research; likes repetition, likes repetition https://replicationresearch.org/
Our platform runs for roughly €25/day — and anyone can publish on it for free. The APC for a single paper could instead keep ResearchEquals online for months: Nature: €10,000 → ~400 days Scientific Data: €2,390 → ~96 days PLOS Biology: $5,500 → ~190 days DM us if your OA funds need more purpose 😉
"If I publish something in a journal with an IF = 10, it gets more citations than if I publish it in a journal with IF = 5. Right?" With the serious game CITED_, you can explore this relationship for your own works: t1p.de/cited
🎉 We’re celebrating #PeerReviewWeek with a Review-a-thon! Gather your lab, classroom, department, or community to review preprints or datasets as a team, in any language or research field. You can win a prize to support your Club's activities! Learn more & register by Aug. 31: bit.ly/Review-a-thon
Congratulations to the project “Replication Research (R2),” which received🏆2026 SIPS Mission Award! Replication Research is a diamond open-access journal that publishes reproductions, replications, and conceptual articles concerning the repetition of research. 🔗 replicationresearch.org
Replication Research
A diamond open-access journal publishing replications, reproductions, and meta-scientific research.
replicationresearch.org
Our new website is now live at www.replicationresearch.org - See what is currently under review, learn more about who we are, customize article appearance, and view lay summaries, viewership stats, etc. for each article. Read more at www.replicationresearch.org/announcement....
We are very happy to have received one of the three SIPS Mission Awards - thank you @improvingpsych.org!
Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)@improvingpsych.org · 2w ago🏆We are very pleased to announce the 2026 Awards Winners and Commendations recipients for the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science! 👏Join us in celebrating the exceptional projects that have revolutionized the field of psychological science. buff.ly/2lUKGFd
🏆We are very pleased to announce the 2026 Awards Winners and Commendations recipients for the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science! 👏Join us in celebrating the exceptional projects that have revolutionized the field of psychological science. buff.ly/2lUKGFd
SIPS 2026 Awards Announced!
We are very pleased to announce the 2026 Awards Winners for the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science! Join us in celebrating the exceptional projects that have revolutionized the fi…
improvingpsych.org
99 Pubpeer comments are ready, with another 2,3K well on their way. By @josefinaw.bsky.social, Prasad Chandrashekar, @zefreeman.bsky.social, and @lukaswallrich.bsky.social, @forrt.bsky.social
Dalmeet Singh Chawla@dalmeet.bsky.social · 3w agoNEW: @pubpeer.com to host thousands of replication studies in a bid to make them more visible. My latest for @nature.com: www.nature.com/articles/d41... @aufdroeseler.bsky.social, @forrt.bsky.social, @josefinaw.bsky.social
Hello world! For the next weeks, I will reply to people on Bluesky to notify them of replications from @forrt.bsky.social's database and retractions from @retractionwatch.com's database. Reply to me if you are annoyed or if I make errors and like my posts if you would like me to continue posting.
Don't mind me, I am just checking if @replicationbot.bsky.social knows that this study was retracted: doi.org/10.1006/obhd...
Redirecting
doi.org
Did you know there is a replication to this study? According to the replication authors, the replication attempt failed. https://forrt.org/flora-replication-atlas/?dois=10.1207%2Fs15324834basp2504_5
I wonder if people would be annoyed by a bot that chimes in whenever they talk about a study that was replicated. For example, it could tell me if this study was replicated: doi.org/10.1207/s153...
Together with five other journals from the Replication Journal Federation (forrt.org/rjf/), we are looking forward to helping researchers make their reproduction studies count.
Lukas Röseler@aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 3w agoRegister now for the 2nd Münster Reproduction Games at indico.uni-muenster.de/e/rg2 > join a one day event to reproduce results from published articles > get support from experts from multiple disciplines > turn your report into an independent, publishable manuscript
Register now for the 2nd Münster Reproduction Games at indico.uni-muenster.de/e/rg2 > join a one day event to reproduce results from published articles > get support from experts from multiple disciplines > turn your report into an independent, publishable manuscript
I’ve just published a #PreprintReview of “Anchoring-Based Causal Design (ABCD): Estimating the Effects of Beliefs” on @prereview.bsky.social prereview.org/reviews/2128...
PREreview of Anchoring-Based Causal Design (ABCD): Estimating the Effects of Beliefs
Authored by Lukas Röseler
prereview.org
I asked Claude to boil down my conversation with @randalljellis.bsky.social on his podcast Metascience Matters to its absolute essence so here is an 80 minutes conversation in two minutes with all the instances of us saying "replicate" and "reproduce". youtu.be/KgCsCR1vbK8
Replication Supercut
YouTube video by Replications, Replications
youtu.be
The @forrt.bsky.social FLoRA project is growing so fast, last week's numbers are already outdated 🤯 As of today, we are at 2.381 pairs of original and replication studies.
New post! "Making Sense of Replications (and Some Nonsense about the Replication Crisis)," in which I suggest a journal club reading list of new papers on replication, and push back on claims that the replication crisis is fake. getsyeducated.substack.com/p/making-sen...
Making Sense of Replications (and Some Nonsense about the Replication Crisis)
It’s hard to overstate just how much the culture around replication in science has changed over the past 15 years.
getsyeducated.substack.com
This is what makes it art: '(...) the publisher posted a blank white page with the cryptic phrase, “This article has been withdrawn due to article violation.” Springer Nature is nevertheless still selling the empty PDF for $39.95.' www.science.org/content/arti...
Why have papers by one of history’s most famous physicists been retracted?
Springer Nature has removed two studies by Max Planck. A bot may be to blame
science.org
I really like @randalljellis.bsky.social's conversations for being about things that you would not read in a paper and I was honored to be one of his guests. We talked about replications, publishing, research assesment, @r2journal.bsky.social, @forrt.bsky.social, power posing, and many more things.
Randy Ellis@randalljellis.bsky.social · last mo.Open science for the weekend! Here's my conversation with Lukas Röseler, Managing Director of the Münster Center for Open Science at the University of Münster. We discussed his experience leading a department dedicated to open science, youtu.be/PSVNZ-OFj3U?...
Our metacheck package now has an online manual! In 29 short chapters we explain how to set up metacheck (running all modules 100% locally if you want), and explain the 18 available modules. www.scienceverse.org/metacheck_bo... We are still in beta, and would love to get feedback!
The Metacheck Manual
A guide to Metacheck, an R package providing a module based tool for checking scientific manuscripts and data repositories for best practices using text search, R code, and optional LLM queries.
scienceverse.org
R2: A New Home for Replication Research – Plus Tips for Getting started New blog post on an interview with @zbw-leibniz.bsky.social on the Open Economics Guide Blog with @flavioazevedo.bsky.social and @lukaswallrich.bsky.social on @r2journal.bsky.social openeconomics.zbw.eu/en/2026/06/r...
R2: A New Home for Replication Research – Plus Tips for Getting Started – Open Economics Guide of the ZBW
Where does replication research stand in economics and business studies and what does a realistic, low-risk entry point for researchers look like? Team members of the new journal Replication Research ...
openeconomics.zbw.eu
Right, enough complaining about academia, let's make things better! A small step, but my colleagues and I are organising the Second Workshop on Replication in the Language Sciences (WoReLa 2) in July 2027 in Cologne: https://sites.google.com/view/worela2. The call for abstract is now open […]
Original post on fediscience.org
fediscience.org
I was very happy to see that Royal Society Open Science just used my @prereview.bsky.social like a traditional review. When I was asked to review the manuscript, I instead did a PREreview (public preprint review) and put nothing but the link to it in my review. prereview.org/reviews/2049...
I built a website that tracks open source tools that provide automated checks for scientific manuscripts: lakens.github.io/automated_re... It provides a summary through RSS feed that you can subscribe to. It tracks 13 repositories - if you want your repo to be included, let me know!
WHAT IS BEING BUILT
Tools that perform automated checks have the potential to assist researchers. Just as a spelling check can warn users for possible misspellings, automated checks of statistical reporting, data and…
lakens.github.io
"Scholarly-led publishing strengthens our academic freedom." Happy to see @dfg.de featuring Diamond OA with The time is ripe for scholarly-led publishing, featuring @opengender.bsky.social, @inggrid.bsky.social, @labphon.bsky.social and @intercomverlag.bsky.social. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjck...
Die Zeit ist reif - Perspektiven zum Wissenschaftsgeleiteten Publizieren
YouTube video by DFG bewegt
youtube.com
Check for replications of a specific article or your entire Zotero library - it only takes a few seconds with our Zotero Replication Checker. Download it for free at forrt.org/flora-zotero/ @zotero.org @forrt.bsky.social
New day, new hope for academia: The second review for the first submission for which I am the handling editor has just been submitted and I can honestly say that both reviewers did an excellent job. It's really nice to see people taking their jobs seriously and devoting time to reviewing other […]
Original post on fediscience.org
fediscience.org
*NEW* @rorinstitute.bsky.social Substack post: @lukaswallrich.bsky.social, @aufdroeseler.bsky.social & @josefinaw.bsky.social explain why they created a database to facilitate discovery of social & behavioural sciences replication studies. researchonresearchinstitute.substack.com/p/did-you-kn...
Did you know this study was replicated?
Tracking and disseminating replications and reproductions
researchonresearchinstitute.substack.com
@ascharpf.bsky.social about sport washing: "States that are being criticized for deficits in democracy or corruption are participating in the regulation of world football"
Pause @ Real Scientists DE@realscientists.de · 2mo agoDas bedeutet: Staaten, die selbst regelmäßig wegen Demokratiedefiziten oder Korruption kritisiert werden, wirken an der Regulierung des Weltfußballs mit.
