Michael Briscoe

@michaelbriscoe.bsky.social

Associate Professor of Sociology at Colorado State University Pueblo. My research looks at intersections of human, animal, and environmental well-being. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Briscoe-3 Posts here reflect my own opinions.

Reminder to register for this year’s Vegan Sociology conference! 🎙 With a theme focusing on internationalising vegan sociology, connecting the local and the global, and building a just world for (non-)human animals alike - this year isn’t one to be missed! 👀 events.humanitix.com/iavs-2026-in...

IAVS 2026: Internationalising Vegan Sociology

The 2026 IAVS annual meeting will showcase research related to veganism, nonhuman animal rights, and sociological theories of international relevance.

events.humanitix.com

I published a new article with Jennifer Givens in @springernature.com 's Socio-Ecological Practice Research. doi.org/10.1007/s425... We interviewed researchers and resource managers working in the FEW nexus about how they thought about stakeholders, including nonhuman nature.

“The customer is the forest”? differences in stakeholder identification between food-energy-water researchers and managers in the Columbia river basin - Socio-Ecological Practice Research

Researchers and resource managers must consider a multiplicity of stakeholders within the food, energy, and water (FEW) nexus – the interconnected and interdependent food, energy, and water sectors. To understand differences in perceptions of stakeholders between researchers and resource managers, we conducted focus group interviews with an advisory group of 33 natural resource managers and multi-disciplinary researchers comprised of university faculty, staff, and students primarily in the Columbia River Basin – primarily Washington state. Our research questions asked which stakeholders were viewed as most important, which were currently being left out of decision-making, and how researchers and resource managers thought about nonhuman nature in the context of stakeholder identification. While there was overlap in the identification of key stakeholders, resource managers tended to bring up groups with less power or interest, while researchers focused on more powerful stakeholders or on resource managers themselves. Nonhuman nature came up in interviews as a key concern in decision-making for our advisory group, but less so for faculty and students. Institutional structures and incentives were key in shaping identification of stakeholders.

doi.org

Know-your-rights trainings are spreading fast as ICE steps up enforcement. But knowing the law doesn’t guarantee it’s respected, explains CSU Pueblo sociologist Heidi Reynolds-Stenson, who studies social movements and protest policing. ⬇️

I write about these bad faith animal welfare arguments against renewable energy in chapter 4 of my new book. Fossil fuel production kills many more animals both directly and indirectly than renewables. At the same time, we can do more to reduce the impact of renewable energy production on animals.

David Ho@davidho.bsky.social · last yr.

There’s no evidence that offshore wind kills whales. But you know what does kill whales? Commercial fishing kills at least 300,000 whales and dolphins every year.

It is tempting to visit animal "wildlife centers" or "sanctuaries" that offer you the chance to get close to animals. The problem is many of these organizations are actually roadside zoos more concerned with profit than animal welfare. Read more in my new piece for @speciesunite.bsky.social

Roadside zoos are animal welfare disasters — Species Unite

Roadside zoos are a welfare nightmare for animals. They are typically small zoos where wild animals are confined in small cages and frequently forced to interact with visitors in stressful and unnatur...

speciesunite.com

Opinion: Gutting humanities signals the end of innovation in business and STEM

As a college professor, watching the dismantling of America’s education system has been among the most discouraging events of my life. American aspirations to be a leader in the world of business and science — which springs from our country’s support only of STEM fields — portend their own loss as things like humanities classes are being threatened with extinction. The things that provide powerful support for the structural modes of thought that promote ideas and innovation are being swept away. And make no mistake, humanities is as important to innovation as science. As an exercise with my Honors students, I ask them to imagine that a group of space aliens arrive and tell them they can have science or humanities but not both (or they will destroy both). Which would they keep? Most people think about the things that have made their lives healthier or allowed them to enjoy the marvels of modern engineering or computation. Interestingly, humanities came first in human history. It was from the humanities that science was developed. The arts were here long before science and are what made science possible. They are the very ground of business and STEM fields. You can make science out of the humanities, but the reverse is unlikely. It’s because we had to have the imagination to build, the capacity to envision new worlds, before we could create something as innovative as science — especially as it was developed in the 17th century. To imagine, dream, think critically and use our minds’ eyes to conceive of futures differently than we were handed are necessary for conjuring new worlds. I often surprise my students when I tell them there is more truth in fiction than in science. I’m being a little tongue-in-cheek, but I do believe it. Science cannot teach us values. They are derived from insights that we learn to understand from the great art, music and literature of the past. The exercise of the imagination is one of the most crucial skills for bringing novelty, invention and new ideas into the world. Reading great literature and listening to world music, poetry, art and other humanities have been vital to my life. The arts humankind has produced have taught me much about how to live more fully and think more critically, caringly and empathically. These skills taught me to think more deeply about the things I taught as a scientist and mathematician. Yes, I teach STEM subjects. My education includes a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Statistics from Brigham Young University, a master’s degree in biostatistics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Ph.D. in biomathematics. I teach and do research in the biology department at BYU. But without my humanities leanings and studies, I would not have been a very good scientist. My humanities classes were a master class in creativity, envisioning new futures and how to think. It was the skills we learned in our humanities classes that bring creativity to all our endeavors. It is foolish to think that we can make progress in any field without the depth of imagination provided by our humanities classes. Yet that is the supposition that is spreading across our nation like a plague. And it is wrong. Literature classes are essential for science. Music for business. Art for engineering. Poetry for values. If you want STEM-only thinking for our businesses and sciences, then get ready to hire AI algorithms or robots. They can handle that aspect quite well. However, as of yet, only humans can think imaginatively. We can dream. We can recognize and embrace values. The world you see unfolding in this destruction of the humanities is nothing less than abandoning innovation, creativity and a better future. Lose the humanities, and you lose the very ground of science and business that depend on it. Destroy those, and you lose the creative future for which we all hope. Opinion: Let’s be thoughtful in our approach to higher education in Utah

deseret.com

This sale is on just about everything including my new book, Stocks or Stakeholders. Use code DGBSUMMER25 brill.com/display/titl... @dgb-philosophy.bsky.social

Stocks or Stakeholders: The Benefits of Considering Animal Interests

"Stocks or Stakeholders: The Benefits of Considering Animal Interests" published on 30 Jun 2025 by Brill.

brill.com

De Gruyter Brill@degruyterbrill.bsky.social · last yr.

☀️ Summer #sale at De Gruyter Brill! Save 40% on our books and eBooks through August. Whether you're prepping for fall courses or expanding your personal library, now's the perfect time to save big. Browse our recommended reads and get shopping now! 🔗 marketing.degruyterbrill.com/summersale20...

Yellow visual with cut-out quotation marks showing an aerial view of waves crashing onto a beach. Text: Summer sale. Enjoy 40% off

I think the carbon intensity of well-being is one of the most useful sustainability measures. What's more important than reducing environmental impact and improving human well-being? Being able to explore and interact with this measure helps people understand it. I've made a dashboard to do so -

public.tableau.com

My book, Stocks or Stakeholders, was released last week as an ebook and this week in hardcover. I was happy to be part of Animals & Society Institute's book series with @degruyterbrill.bsky.social as their books and journals played a big role for me as a student and continue to as a scholar.

Stocks or Stakeholders: The Benefits of Considering Animal Interests

"Stocks or Stakeholders: The Benefits of Considering Animal Interests" published on 30 Jun 2025 by Brill.

brill.com

Lots of vaccine news these past two weeks. I wrote a short piece for @speciesunite.bsky.social on the bird flu vaccine, which had its funding terminated at the end of May, and why intensive animal agriculture means bird flu is likely to remain a threat to animal and human health.

The bird flu vaccine just lost US funding, do we still need it? — Species Unite

We have not yet experienced a bird flu pandemic, and there is little understanding of how dangerous this disease is.

speciesunite.com

This short piece draws from and highlights the work of @joshsbicca.bsky.social with CSU's Prison Agriculture Lab and Amy Fitzgerald's article in the Journal for Critical Animal Studies to explain how the prison and animal industrial complexes reinforce each other.

Species Unite@speciesunite.bsky.social · last yr.

Research finds that two-thirds of states have incarcerated people working in animal agriculture. @michaelbriscoe.bsky.social dives into this issue for Species Unite: