J. D.

@jdetc.bsky.social

Chicago/ish. Civil/ish litigator. Left-center/ish. Elder Millennial. He/him. Interests/etc.: 1A/defamation, lolsuits, half of true crime, food, Cubs, Chi teams other than the Sox, EPL/soccer, art/architecture, film, indie music, enviro issues, tech

This argument shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the what, why, and how of adverse possession. Open/notorious use works with land because the owner can and should inspect the land. How do I know if someone is using my or a dead relative's ID? And IDs are by law not transferable property so lol.

Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 2d ago

9th Cir. declines to extend the property-law concept of adverse possession to a stolen identity. Man lived 30 years using the birth certificate/SSN of a baby who died in infancy. He argued he had become that person because he "had done the work." Held: Nope. cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

There is no basis in law or reason for us to conclude that one may adversely possess the identity of another person. The Supreme Court has held that “[a]n individual’s identity is more than just his name or Social Security number.” Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435, 450 (2013). A person’s identity is a part of, not separate from, their personhood. And no matter how long one uses another person’s name, they simply do not become the other person.  The identities that Primrose and his wife assumed belonged to infants who were not long for this world. That the infants’ lives were short does not erase their existence or their importance. And no matter what Primrose and his wife did with the infants’ identities, those identities still belonged to the infants who were born on the dates and received the names that were recorded in their birth certificates. It is not at all clear that the infants, their parents, or family were not “harmed” by Primrose’s actions. And Primrose’s contention that he is the one “who had done the work” to establish an identity under the Bobby Edward Fort name by living a life under that name for 30 years is beside the point.

Among other issues, for 1956 there were nine fiction finalists, of which four were women, one of the men (Bowles) was known to be LGBTQ+, and we really can't know for certain who else was LGBTQ+. The only one of the bunch in "the canon" I think is Flannery O'Connor's A Good Man is Hard to Find.

Maris Kreizman@maris.bsky.social · 2d ago

LOL, the gotcha part in the second paragraph is truly hilarious. Who will think of the straight white rightwing men in the literary world? WHO? WHO?

Last week, the longlists for the National Book Awards were announced. Among the 20 authors in the fiction and nonfiction categories, nearly all are straight white males. Most are also on the political right, some even on the far right. Remarkably, mainstream media outlets haven’t reported this, perhaps because they don’t think it’s noteworthy. It’s as if we were living in 1956 rather than 2026.

If you’re scratching your head at this “news,” well, it’s because I made it up. Or rather, I inverted the particulars about the authors’ identities and their political views to make a point: If today, as a reader, you recoil at the thought of a time in which minorities were systematically marginalized when it came to the literary world’s public honors (and so much else), shouldn’t you also recoil now that the tables have been almost completely turned? And if you object to the right’s efforts to politicize the arts, won’t you also object when the efforts come from the left?

Hanania is a lot of things (grifter, pervert, pseudo-intellect) but don't forget that he's a plain ol' lousy writer. You need nothing here after the sixth line. We all get it. Sixteen more lines after that. "She a lyin' ho" fits on one for goodness' sake. Style matters.

Post nicht verfügbar.

Moving from Lagos to Queens = WELCOME FRIEND Moving from Lagos to Houston in utero, attending med school in Chicago, residency in Boston, and then moving to Queens and working as an ER doctor in a local hospital = GENTRIFYING COLONIZING ASS Some of you never went through a 1L year and it shows.

How do you type this and not realize you're making a bigot's point and you should pump the brakes? This is not a position anyone in legitimate 2026 discourse should be taking.

Tweet from Starshine: why do you want to call people slurs?

Parker Molloy reply: Have you seen the account I was referring to?

Democrats were about twenty-five years late figuring this out, but drafting mainline ministers to run in red states is a fairly good defense against some of the more idiotic accusations that get thrown at "the left" and the GOP's attempted monopolization as the party of God(c).

Poll Tracker 📊@polltracker.bsky.social · 6d ago

Kansas Senate (Emerson) 🔵Adam Hamilton: 45% 🔴Roger Marshall: 43% 🟡David Graham: 4% 9/15-16 Link: emersoncollegepolling.com/kansas-2026/

Bluesky being like high school has never felt more true than finding out there's apparently a sex cult going on and not one of you told me about it.