Max Korbmacher

@maxkorbmacher.bsky.social

Imaging neuroscientist. Brain (bio)markers, big data, MRI, meta & open/better science. Views are my own.

Nature recently published massive studies on the credibility of social science. We — the Norwegian co-authors on the robustness-paper, Gerit Pfuhl, @oysteinhernaes.bsky.social, @maxkorbmacher.bsky.social, and me — wrote an opinion piece about it (in Norwegian): www.forskersonen.no/forskning-kr...

Hva kjennetegner god vitenskap?

KRONIKK: Troverdig forskning er ikke forskning uten usikkerhet. Det er forskning som viser oss usikkerheten i stedet for å skjule den.

forskersonen.no

Brian Nosek@briannosek.bsky.social · 4mo ago

SCORE, a collaboration of 865 researchers, is now released as three papers in Nature, six preprints, and a lot of data (cos.io/score/). SCORE examined repeatability of findings from the social-behavioral sciences and tested whether human and automated methods could predict replicability.

Is the “standard workflow” holding back fMRI analysis? Mass-univariate analysis is still the bread-and-butter: intuitive, fast… and chronically overfitted. Add harsh multiple-comparison penalties, and we patch the workflow with statistical band-aids. No wonder the stringency debates never die.