Alexander Avila

@alexander-avila.bsky.social

YouTuber guy https://youtube.com/@alexander_avila

My overall point is made in the video: practically, the *expansion* of copyright in this case would not fix the problem of displacement and consolidate power in the hands of bad actors. I believe training should be considered fair use (with that caveat that outputs CAN be infringement in specific

1. I never claimed the lawsuit was dismissed, I claimed that the *specific* claims I was referencing were dismissed, namely, the ones about derivative works. [1:34:39]. I say “According to copyright law, a derivative work is one which substantially borrows the expression of ideas

Karla Ortiz@kortizart.bsky.social · last yr.

1/5 I saw these clips and it gets worse. You got all the classic hits: 1. Our lawsuit got dismissed (it didnt) 2. While simultaneously dismissing that our case being allowed to move on copyright claims is no big deal (it is) 3. GenAi is like a search engine (it’s not)