Akhila Yerukola

@akhilayerukola.bsky.social

PhD student at CMU LTI; Interested in pragmatics and cross-cultural understanding; intern @ Allen Institute for AI |Prev: Senior Research Engineer @ Samsung Research America | Masters @ Stanford https://akhila-yerukola.github.io/

Did you know gifting four koi 🐟 is offensive in Japan (4 = "shi" = death 💀), or that chopsticks 🥢upright in rice is inappropriate in China (like funeral incense 🕯️)? Top VLMs don't! Our #COLM2026 paper introduces 🌏NormViz to measure visual norm understanding in 16 countries. Best model: 25.3% 🚨 🧵👇

Overview of NORMVIZ-BENCH for visual norm understanding, consisting of 3,272 contrastive image pairs across 16 countries that differ only in the culturally relevant behavior. (a) A contrastive pair example from Japan; group accuracy requires a model to correctly classify both images in a pair. (b) Images are sourced via Text-to-Image generation,
inpainting, and Retrieval. (c) Benchmark statistics and pair type distribution.

🔈For the SoLaR workshop @COLM_conf we are soliciting opinion abstracts to encourage new perspectives and opinions on responsible language modeling, 1-2 of which will be selected to be presented at the workshop. Please use the google form below to submit your opinion abstract ⬇️

🖋️ Curious how writing differs across (research) cultures? 🚩 Tired of “cultural” evals that don't consult people? We engaged with interdisciplinary researchers to identify & measure ✨cultural norms✨in scientific writing, and show that❗LLMs flatten them❗ 📜 arxiv.org/abs/2506.00784 [1/11]

An overview of the work “Research Borderlands: Analysing Writing Across Research Cultures” by Shaily Bhatt, Tal August, and Maria Antoniak. The overview describes that We  survey and interview interdisciplinary researchers (§3) to develop a framework of writing norms that vary across research cultures (§4) and operationalise them using computational metrics (§5). We then use this evaluation suite for two large-scale quantitative analyses: (a) surfacing variations in writing across 11 communities (§6); (b) evaluating the cultural competence of LLMs when adapting writing from one community to another (§7).

When it comes to text prediction, where does one LM outperform another? If you've ever worked on LM evals, you know this question is a lot more complex than it seems. In our new #acl2025 paper, we developed a method to find fine-grained differences between LMs: 🧵1/9

Bild

Yes! tbh this method is probably much more immediately useful for helping one understand subtle differences between [models trained on] subtly different data subsets, vs a loftier goal of helping one find "the" best data mixture -- to anyone considering this method, please feel free to reach out :)

Ted Underwood@tedunderwood.com · last yr.

The method in this paper was designed to find an optimal data mixture. But researchers in the human sciences who are training models *in order to understand the effect of the data* might also consider this as a clever way of evaluating hundreds of subsets without training hundreds of models. #MLSky