Andres Karjus

@andreskarjus.bsky.social

Evolutionary linguist, cultural analyst, lecturer in DH&AI @ Tallinn Uni, researcher @ EBS, associate professor of comp soc sci @ Uni Tartu andreskarjus.github.io (academic) datafigure.eu (DH&AI workshops&consulting)

If you missed A. Karjus's brilliant presentation on AI in Research last month, you can now watch it on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Daef... The AI-teh seminar series continues in September.

AI-teh seminar 08.06.26. Andres Karjus- AI in Research: from Annotators to Assistants and Agents

YouTube video by Digihumanitaaria keskus

youtube.com

Andres Karjus@andreskarjus.bsky.social · last mo.

That's not a "real" paper btw But in a recent workshop for @digitsut.bsky.social I talked AI agents &how it's now trivial to gen full (tho likely mediocre) papers&theses in ~1h. Asked for example topic, had codex mine data&write; they uploaded it w slides Now Google Scholar wants to index it.

Actually, more I think about it, for academic-industry incentives (more papers&cites; not the same as good science goals) the quality doesn't even matter that much :/ Sure could be improved, but as more ppl use agents, what matters is whether its enough GEO'd to get cited by agents &pass AI review.

Andres Karjus@andreskarjus.bsky.social · last mo.

That's not a "real" paper btw But in a recent workshop for @digitsut.bsky.social I talked AI agents &how it's now trivial to gen full (tho likely mediocre) papers&theses in ~1h. Asked for example topic, had codex mine data&write; they uploaded it w slides Now Google Scholar wants to index it.

In light of recent AI writing debates, NeurIPS rejecting papers based on AI-detector results (lol), and certain academics piling AI user colleagues on the other app... What is actually more important in an academic paper: - the prose, narrative, writing, or - the question, method, result, insight?

New paper published with @andreskarjus.bsky.social as shared 1st author: We show experimentally that professional artists' skill set can transfer to making images with generative AI; tested with artists, laypeople, and GPT-4o copying an image or creatively diverging from it, only by prompting.

Expertise Elevates AI Usage: Experimental Evidence Comparing Laypeople and Professional Artists

Generative AI’s novel capacities raise questions about the future role of human expertise: does it level the playing field between professional artists and laypeople, or does expertise enhance AI u...

tandfonline.com

Amazing scene at a socsci internet research seminar. At the end a comp sci guy asks if there's maybe practical takeaways, action points we could summarize. First gets accused of "sounding like chatgpt", then a socsci lady pulls out a pack and goes well no but can I interest you in these tarot cards?

Bild

Prediction: - most major publishers will AI-automate desk decisions and/or review in next few years. A similar pipeline in reverse will be sufficient for their (already low) level of review quality. - open access will increase (to get cited by agents) NO WAY a capitalist enterprise will... 1/

Per Engzell@pengzell.bsky.social · 3mo ago

What can we learn from automating an entire quantitative social science paper, from prompt to finished product? Thread about ongoing work with @natewilmers.bsky.social 1/12 Paper: osf.io/preprints/so...

Random thought, these axes are prob correlated right? AI use ↔ anti-AI dogmatism imposter syndr. ↔ intel. arrogance/authority attachment Imposters be like "I don't know shit, neither does this thing, let's go" The 2nd type "But using this🦜 signals inferiority, lowers me to the level of layman, bad

A problem yes, but I suspect a lot here stems from reference management practices ("I do refs by hand" crowd) in academia generally, amped by AI. What amazes tho is that these 30% profit margin companies 3yrs in have not invested enough yet in automated ref checking (easier if DOI&bibtex required)

T. Ryan Gregory 🇨🇦@tryangregory.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Lazy use of AI by half-ass researchers is putting digital asbestos everywhere, which will be a huge pain in the ass to clean up. Just do your damn job as a scholar or let someone else with more integrity and competence have your position. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Another day, another clearly AI generated review for a paper. Is that now the new normal, like, academics and editors just quietly accepted it? Hollow words asking us to randomly "discuss more", "consider this", "address that", and we're supposed to respect it as expert opinion to follow?

a man in a leather jacket and tie is saying cool cool cool cool cool cool cool

ALT: a man in a leather jacket and tie is saying cool cool cool cool cool cool cool

media.tenor.com

In Madrid via EdTech Talents for a month, visiting our partner JdeRobot, furthering collaborations w private sector &academia, while continuing development of a prototype meant to synergyze with the other couple of related projects we got going on at Tallinn University. Happy to meet for coffee too!

Bild

Amazing what counts as a "real" and "digital" signature in different parts of Europe, from the "please print-sign-scan and make it look badly scanned=real" of Italy to the "hey here's your name but in a MSWord95 kinda font" of Spain.

Bild

Prediction: publishing/peer review will go full circle before any hope of reformation. Already now: AI-written papers reviewed by R's using AI Next: AI papers weighed by AI editors for AI review; publications summarized by research bots...to write AI papers.

Bild

Lil late to the "AI is killing edu" party, as I haven't been teaching students as much as training educators &businesses last 3 yrs, but I guess I now know the pain of having to assign A to the perfect (likely AI) submission and a C to the imperfect but likely human attempt. Is there a word for it?

Bild

Slides of all the lightning talks (three each) available here as a single deck: 2025.computational-humanities-research.org/data/lightni... - a great way to get a bird's eye view of recent developments in computational/digital humanities!

2025.computational-humanities-research.org

Andres Karjus@andreskarjus.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Attending the #CHR2025 Computational Humanities Research conf in Luxembourg this week. Also we're hiring in 2 computational soc sci/data sci projects, a short-term postdoc and a longer term postdoc or senior researcher; ERC level salaries, remote possible - come have a chat if interested.

Attending the #CHR2025 Computational Humanities Research conf in Luxembourg this week. Also we're hiring in 2 computational soc sci/data sci projects, a short-term postdoc and a longer term postdoc or senior researcher; ERC level salaries, remote possible - come have a chat if interested.

Bild

Latex is amazing. In what other programming language do you make an error in 2025 and get told to go read a book from 1984 to solve it, and if the book is too long, no problem buddy just look up the term "weird error" in the index, easy.

Bild

Humanities can greatly benefit from ML/AI (esp with the wealth of data digitized now), and could & should be at the center of the AI revolution to help design smarter, less biased, more human and humanistic models. Unfortunately, in many places this sort of dogmatic romantic primitivism prevails.

Phoebe Toups Dugas 🏳️‍⚧️@snapdragoness.itch.io · 12mo ago

What a disappointment. There is no place for AI in historical research, it'll just poison everything.