Anne

@annehstevenson.bsky.social

Advocate for public health, health equity, and tennis.

🚨New paper alert!🚨 👉Check out the paper I am most proud of here: rdcu.be/e4IaT 🤔After 8+of working in 🧬🧠research, I didn't see many people with lived experience of mental health conditions (LE) w/🪑at the table. So, several of us laid out 5 recs to Nat. Inst of Mental Health to change this: 1/4

Centering lived experience within psychiatric genetic and genomic research at the National Institute of Mental Health

Nature Mental Health - People with lived experience of mental health conditions have historically been excluded from meaningful participation in psychiatric genetic and genomic research. This...

rdcu.be

Ever tried to explain research ethics to your family? This is a great piece of journalism (ie: written for a lay audience) of some of the thorny aspects of ethics in human subjects research - participant remuneration, beneficence. @npr.org

Why I volunteered to be infected with dengue fever

The U.S. has registered over half a million clinical trials since 2000. Here's a look at the business and ethics of human medical experimentation through the eyes of a volunteer.

npr.org

Public health today is under attack, but nobody is rushing to save it Why? When public health works, NOTHING happens - bad things are prevented and nobody even knows Because the successes are not visible, people take it for granted Public health must communicate our successes We must be visible

My family doesn’t have any underlying conditions, but I want these vaccines for all of us AND insurance should cover them. With this ruling, I cannot imagine my health insurance being willing to pay for them. 💉❤️‍🩹

usatoday.com

Calling mental health clinicians, researchers, and funders! Can we stop using the PHQ-9? Or at least change the response options? As someone who has had to fill it out many, many times, the response options make no sense. Quote from a friend: “I just fill out what I think they are trying to get at.”

Bild

#Academicchatter: Was asked by a senior author 2 give critical eye 2 paper. Argument of paper was sound but many errors like X citation does not support Y statement. I spent a lot of time on this. 1st author rejected most comments. Do u: 1️⃣Keep your name on paper? 2️⃣Take your name off paper? 3️⃣Other?

Husband read in @wsj.com how MAGA says scientific journals are “in bed with their friends and pharma.” His takeaway was that it sounded true. This is someone who lives in a house w a person who has published ~30 articles. I explained that that isn’t how it works. How would a lay person know that?

Bild

An important lesson that most faculty could stand to learn - one that I'm constantly reminding myself about - is that "I am supportive of junior colleagues" and "I am supportive of the specific junior colleagues I personally like and want to be around" actually have radically divergent consequences

American taxpayers provide the resources for CDC’s specialists and have the right to hear directly from them without interference by politicians. Eliminating communications staff from CDC means we all have less information on how to protect ourselves from health threats.

RFK Jr. purges CDC and FDA's public records teams, despite "transparency" promises

It is unclear what will happen to hundreds of pending requests for public information as the health agencies slash staff.

cbsnews.com

Federico Agustin Gomez, the world no. 135, opens up about his mental health struggles and having suicidal thoughts. 💔 It takes a brave person to open up about their darkest moments and face them. Hopefully he can come out on the other side of this stronger. (via Federico's IG)

Bild