Filippa Lentzos

@filippalentzos.bsky.social

Associate Professor of Science & International Security at King’s College London critically analysing health security threats, biosecurity & biorisk management filippalentzos.com

The more immediate #AI #bioweapons concern is not that AI suddenly enables amateurs but that it amplifies already capable actors, I told @guardian. The key question is which barriers AI lowers, for whom, and at what points in the biological threat pathway. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

Could AI ‘change the stakes’ in the development of bioweapons?

Experts say the technology could help terrorists and nation states with production but that significant hurdles remain

theguardian.com

Countries could soon begin shaping a verification system for the Biological Weapons Convention, something it still lacks. They should build a verification scheme that generates robust, independently acquired and mutually intelligible evidence, writes Filippa Lentzos @filippalentzos.bsky.social. ⬇️

Are countries making bioweapons? ‘Bioaudits’ could help find out

Countries could soon begin shaping the contours of a verification system for the global treaty banning bioweapons–something the Biological Weapons Convention, which entered into force in 1975, still…

buff.ly

"We are not starting from scratch," I tell @sciam.bsky.social on AI-designed viruses. There is already substantial governance of pathogens. "The challenge is to connect that existing governance to the new upstream capability to design biology digitally." www.scientificamerican.com/article/scie...

Scientists are using AI to design new viruses. What could go wrong?

Research is outpacing regulation to govern artificial-intelligence-designed biology

scientificamerican.com