Daniel Mügge

@dmugge.bsky.social

Professor of Political Arithmetic at Uni of Amsterdam | Political economy of AI governance | Leader of the RegulAite project (https://www.regulaite.eu)

The front and back cover of this week's New Yorker. Says the BofA ad on the back: "You didn't come this far just to come this far." Just what the front cover dude cozily tucked away under the $-bill was thinking before he dozed off. A bit of cognitive dissonance, seeing them next to each other...

BildBild

"Waar blijft het Ministerie voor Digitale Zaken om de regie over tech in de samenleving terug te pakken?" vragen @marleenstikker.bsky.social en ik in NRC. #AI raakt zo ongeveer alle facetten van de samenleving. Uitermate slecht idee dus om het aan Big Tech over te laten. www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/...

Opinie | AI zou een politieke topprioriteit moeten zijn

Digitalisering en AI veranderen de samenleving ingrijpend. Nederland heeft dringend een strategisch AI-beleid nodig voor autonomie en veiligheid.

nrc.nl

📢 Postdoc job alert 'Politcal Masculinities and Young Voters. The position is part of my NWO-VICI-project Political Masculinities in Europe . Please, share with potentially interested candidates with survey skills and expertise in quantitative methods. werkenbij.uva.nl/en/vacancies...

Vacancy — Postdoc Political Masculinities and Young Voters

The Department of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam (UvA) is looking for a postdoctoral researcher to join the Dutch Research Council (NWO-VICI) project ‘Political Masculinities in Euro...

werkenbij.uva.nl

A year ago, Brussels uncorked champagne after the #AI Act adoption. Now, the "regulatory superpower"-story is dead; it's all about "AI competitiveness". @leevisaari.bsky.social and I ask: is this bowing to US pressure, or does the EU finally step up to the plate? www.techpolicy.press/the-eu-ai-po...

The EU AI Policy Pivot: Adaptation or Capitulation? | TechPolicy.Press

Daniel Mügge and Leevi Saari ask, "What are we to make of the EU's AI policy pivot?"

techpolicy.press

For better or worse, a realistic take on #AI in military affairs: connecting dots, and fast. With this, EU's vulnerability - defense split along borders - becomes only more acute. For independence from foreign tech, genuine integration is the only option. www.technologyreview.com/2024/12/10/1...

We saw a demo of the new AI system powering Anduril’s vision for war

We’re living through the first drone wars, but AI is poised to change the future of warfare even more drastically.

technologyreview.com

In the meantime, some things I found interesting: @dmugge.bsky.social writes about lessons from Trump's win for EU's digital transformation: "If Europe wants digitalisation to bring genuine societal progress, the lodestar should not be a competitive race with the US" www.euractiv.com/section/tech...

The Trump win and its lesson for EU tech policy

Trump’s win not only reminds Europe that it must be able to stand on its own feet in digital tech. It also illustrates the collateral damage unguided digitalisation can do to societies, writes Daniel ...

euractiv.com

The #EU "digital sovereignty" push concentrates too much on beating US Big Tech at its own game. Instead, it must harness digital technologies for social progress much more forcefully - w/foreign companies where possible; with its own #Eurostack where necessary. www.hertie-school.org/en/digital-g...

A better lodestar for EU AI sovereignty

“AI made in Europe” has been the lodestar of EU AI policy since 2018. Six years later, US companies’ grip on everything digital in the EU has only tightened

hertie-school.org

What's the point of "AI made in Europe", a key plank of the EU's digital sovereignty agenda? It could be used to extract the EU from a delirious "AI race" - or to try to get ahead in it. What does EU strategy itself have to say? My two cents in the LSE Europe blog 👇 blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2...

What is the point of “AI made in Europe”?

The EU has announced plans to make Europe a hub for artificial intelligence (AI). Daniel Mügge writes that while this sounds like a noble cause, the EU’s strategy is limited by its focus on enhanci…

blogs.lse.ac.uk

Digital sovereignty is a big thing in Brussels - also in #AI. But what are the politics behind the "EU AI sovereignty" ambition? Who needs it, and why? For the Journal of European Public Policy, I've dissected 6 yrs of Commission strategy to find out. Now OA here: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

EU AI sovereignty: for whom, to what end, and to whose benefit?

EU policy emphasises the need for digital sovereignty, also in artificial intelligence (AI). But because such ‘AI sovereignty’ could be used for diverse and even conflicting goals, it obscures the ...

tandfonline.com

A lot of ink has been spilled already on the OpenAI saga this fall. Here, finally, is the New Yorker version of it. Worth the read even if the weekend-long Altman oyster feels so like yesterday's news already. www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...

The Inside Story of Microsoft’s Partnership with OpenAI

The companies had honed a protocol for releasing artificial intelligence ambitiously but safely. Then OpenAI’s board exploded all their carefully laid plans.

newyorker.com

Politiek Brussel draait vanavond overuren om te kijken of er toch nog akkoord komt over de #AI Act. Ondertussen hebben vijf collega AI-wetenschappers en ik voor de NRC al een keer gefantaseerd hoe de wereld er uit zou kunnen zien als zo'n wet er helemaal niet kwam... www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2023/...

Hoe ziet de wereld er in 2040 uit als de mensheid AI zonder regulering toelaat?

AI Act: Hoe ziet de toekomst eruit zonder AI-wetgeving? NRC vroeg zes prominente AI-wetenschappers het leven te beschrijven van een Europese burger in 2040.

nrc.nl