Adam Smith

@dradamame.bsky.social

Educational developer and musician (pianist/organist). Maggie's dog dad. Opinions are my own, not my employer's.

What she ( @sarosecav.bsky.social ) said: "... I believe what our youth need in learning to live healthfully in a technological world is akin to what they need to learn to live healthfully in a sexual world - not abstinence-based approaches but education, open conversations, and good modeling."

Sarah Rose Cavanagh@sarosecav.bsky.social · 6d ago

July newsletter! Featuring @retrievelearn.bsky.social and Bethany Lisi, some new curiosity & learning research, why college should be more fun, a battle about phones and play and mental health, and one solution for what to do about all that zucchini. newsletter.sarahrosecav.com/on-curiosity/

Thanks @naomialderman.bsky.social for both this project and her book 'The Future,' which helped me embrace an episode of insomnia this morning ... 200 pages later, and I didn't want to stop reading. I really really like the 'Couch to 5k' frame for reading! naomialderman.substack.com/p/couch-to-5...

reading instead of scrolling will make you happier

'couch to 5k' for reading, week 2: some lovely readers have made us *trackers*! and: how has it gone?! how are you enjoying it?

naomialderman.substack.com

Love love LOVED this piece. Nuance is not a four-letter word ... and Haidt's good/bad simplification creates only more divides. "To quote Odgers: why are we banning things when we could be building things? Taking teen mental health seriously has to mean more than just banning social media.

Matthew Sheffield@matthew.flux.community · 3w ago

Jonathan Haidt is a right-wing activist that no one on the left should be supporting. His campaign against children having tech freedom is extremely harmful to disadvantaged kids, goes against better social science data, and empowers Christian supremacists. Please read this and share w/parents:

I really appreciate this stance. Too many people try to use "but it's useful" as a counterargument to what we say, for example, in The AI Con. Useful for whom and at what cost (to the user and especially others) should always be the immediate follow up.

tante@tante.cc · 3w ago

"In a burning world we need to hold ourselves and each other to a higher standard. “Useful” is far, far from being good enough." https://tante.cc/2026/07/15/useful-is-not-sufficient/

Wonder if this will become a new faultline in higher education... an all (universities basically requiring AI use/literacy) or nothing (see below) approach. While I know where my sympathies lie, I'm wondering what other overhaul will accompany this choice: investments in pedagogy?

Amy Landers@amylanders.bsky.social · 4w ago

Univ of Chicago law's AI policy: "Across all 1L sections, we will prohibit the use of electronic devices such as laptops, tablets, and phones in the classroom." Hey, I heard that gasp. www.law.uchicago.edu/news/ai-stra...

Definitely of a piece with @jamesmlang.bsky.social 'Write Like You Teach.' When I think of Jill Lepore's work in the New Yorker (as well as her excellent books), I think of someone who is cognizant of her capital A audience. Loved this piece. www.insidehighered.com/opinion/colu...

Heather Cox Richardson Hears the Public Scholar Music

The historian behind Letters From an American, now read by more than three million subscribers, says the secret to public scholarship is remembering how to teach.

insidehighered.com

Leaving aside 'frequently unasked questions' (lolz) as a nice title, this piece helped me (along with a @slate.com writeup). Defining stochastic parrot is a descriptor (not a pejorative). Stochastic Parrots 🦜: Frequently Unasked Questions by @emilymbender.bsky.social medium.com/p/stochastic...

Stochastic Parrots 🦜: Frequently Unasked Questions

It’s been a bit over five years since the Stochastic Parrots paper (Bender, Gebru et al 2021) was published (and somewhat longer since…

medium.com

"What the U.S. desperately needs is socialists, traditional liberals, independents, and pro-democracy conservatives to disagree with one another during Democratic primaries but then join together to defeat the MAGA right in general elections..." newrepublic.com/article/2125... via @newrepublic.com

Democratic Centrists Need to Stop Saying “Both Sides” Have “Extremes”

Yes, democratic socialists are left of traditional Democrats. But they aren’t remotely as radical—or anywhere near as powerful—as the MAGA right.

newrepublic.com

I concur but understand how this will be cast as communism on the order of “taking your beef.” do we tax and/or regulate the consumer … or the producer? Do we simply shame people in dangerously large vehicles (beyond cyber truck shaming… obvs)? Do we lobby for better walkable infrastructure?

The War on Cars@thewaroncars.bsky.social · last mo.

"The report calls for hood height caps of 85 cm (33.5 inches), width limits of 192 cm (75.6 inches), taxes tied to vehicle dimensions, parking fees based on size, and regulatory incentives reserved for smaller EVs measuring less than 4.2 meters (165.4 inches) long."

“That’s the worse dystopian outcome …” he says… “the idea of us willingly, without any overlord telling us so, saying ‘I think my voice would be better expressed by an unthinking machine who has plagiarised all of the world’s authors and has come up with this terrible soup of bad writing.’”

Neil Turkewitz@neilturkewitz.bsky.social · last mo.

“You’re one of one. You’re unprecedented in the entire line of human history. Only you have your brain. Only you can think of what you can think of. Only you can tell a story in a particular way. Why would you cede that to a machine?” —Dave Eggers

Will never not sing my praises for @allisonpugh.bsky.social 's The Last Human Job. Reorienting our economy to value the caring/relational work that our demographics will soon require (again population, possible automation of many jobs, need for dignified work) points in the direction of this book.

Princeton University Press@princetonupress.bsky.social · last mo.

@allisonpugh.bsky.social's The Last Human Job is featured in Moe Carrick’s piece for @fastcompany.com: “Pugh’s research. . . [is] about what it costs, to both parties, when someone is seen versus processed. AI will not save your culture. The people leader who knows her people will."

The evidence-base around performance evaluations rhymes with critiques of traditional grading (backward looking, veil of objectivity, etc.). It's striking that the creation of quantitative measures in a fluid, subjective 'knowledge work' environment also rhymes. theconversation.com/job-performa...

Job performance reviews are outdated and often pointless. Why do we still use them?

One survey showed employees are 57% less likely than leaders to believe performance management is working well. But there are better ways.

theconversation.com