@drsarahhook.bsky.social

Snr Lecturer in IP and Media Law. Researcher in legal impediments to freedom of expression, derivative creativity and moral rights. Opinions only mine.

A benefit to the interdisciplinary fragmented nature of my scholarship - AI cant find my speciality so spam journals and AI PhD enquiries have trouble finding the ways to intersect making it easy to spot! My scholarship is underlying barriers to freedom of expression and speech, AI can’t read this.

I’ve not heard this distinction so much in Australia but agree it’s a terrible term! My students mostly find patents straightforward if technical, but copyright has more conceptual difficulties!

Post nicht verfügbar.

When the clock strikes midnight on January 1, creative works from 1929 & sound recordings from 1924 will enter the public domain in the US, like: ⚓️ Popeye 🕵️ The Maltese Falcon 📖 The Sound and the Fury 🇮🇹 A Farewell to Arms 🏠️ A Room of One's Own 🙌 Hallelujah 🎺 Bolero and many more! 🧵👇

Singin' in the Public Domain event tile, featuring the Lockette, expressing open content.

The real story here is the lost argument to have ‘trade marks’ appear as two words. Appeals to the Constitution, the vibe and even the Act were not enough! Lovely working with @drmarieip.bsky.social and Associate Professor Vicki Huang for this piece: theconversation.com/rayguns-clai...

Raygun’s claim against a parody musical may not stand up: here’s what the law says

Raygun is unlikely to be able to claim intellectual property over her name, her persona and her dance moves.

theconversation.com

I experimented with client interviews this semester in IP law as a way of avoiding AI exam responses and it worked better than I thought. The ability to prod, question and clarify really helped evaluate the students understanding. Still not sure how to do this at scale but a fun, robust assessment!