Thomas Rogers

@drtom-historian.bsky.social

Interested in history: colonial Australian, Australian Indigenous, British Imperial, violence, military, genocide. Views my own.

I’ve seen two published histories recently refer to the Australian “Infantry” Force. It should be *Imperial*. The error omits soldiers (e.g. artillery), and also downplays just how important the British Empire was in Australia. Cf. the “expeditionary” forces: BEF, CEF, NZEF.

H. Septimus Power, Bringing Up the Guns (1921), AWM ART03334: https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C167366. 
Oil painting in the collection of the Australian War Memorial.

CLOSING NEXT WEEK - submit your entry by Tuesday 30 September to be in the running for the Ken Inglis Postgraduate Prize. Did you present a paper at the AHA conference in July? Email it to us: ahs-history@unimelb.edu.au See the pinned post for more details.

Wondering about late-19th-C British army doctrine of cold steel - a seemingly unshakeable belief that, if only the British infantry could get into close combat, the battle would be won. I.e. the Corporal Jones doctrine: "They don't like it up 'em, sir!" There's a cultural study in there somewhere.