Duncan Hollis

@duncanhollis.bsky.social

Laura H. Carnell Prof. of Law, Temple University; Non-Resident Scholar, Carnegie I study treaties, international organizations, and how to regulate state behavior in cyberspace (not always in that order)

I've got a new piece up @foreignpolicy.com reviewing the Islamabad MOU. My short take-away: the draft lacked sufficient input from int'l lawyers on both sides. As a result, the text sends conflicting signals on whether it's a treaty or not, with implications for the US Congress among others.

Is the MOU a Treaty or Not? And Why Should We Care?

Confusing language in the U.S.-Iran cease-fire agreement makes its legal status unclear.

foreignpolicy.com

So pleased after 3+ years of work to see this in print ... Whether you like originalism or not, I've tried to offer insights on why the Constitution uses terms like treaties & compacts (to say nothing of Benedict Arnold's 'sponsion' or Gen. Washington's 'executive' agreement with Lord Cornwallis)

The Original Meaning of Treaties

For nearly two centuries, all three branches of the federal government have thought that the original meaning of the Constitution’s references to treaties and compacts was lost. This Article aims to r...

scholarship.law.upenn.edu

Martha Finnemore and I have a new co-authored piece up on SSRN about how calls for protecting the public core of the internet (whether as a matter of law or norms) require more definitional work on what the term "public" means. For those interested in digital governance, check it out!

What is "Public" About the Internet's Core?

<span>The idea of a norm protecting the "public core" of the internet has gained international attention in the past decade among states and scholars

papers.ssrn.com

Amidst all the (entirely justifiable angst) over the potential acts of aggression/war crimes a US occupation of Gaza would entail, it's worth remembering that int'l law also prohibits threats to use force unlawfully. In other words, the very speech is a violation ...

Threatening Force in Cyberspace

Threats have long been endemic in inter-State relations with diverse goals, communicative values and means of signaling. Yet, international law explicitly focu

papers.ssrn.com

Last Spring, @templelaw.bsky.social was honored to host Rich Visek giving the 1st official State Dept. "L" views on int'l law & cyberspace since Brian Egan in 2018 (which followed Harold Hongju Koh's pathbreaking 2012 remarks). See the link below for Temple Law Review's publication of his remarks!

THE 2024 ARLIN M. AND NEYSA ADAMS LECTURE: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND CYBERSPACE: BUILDING CONSENSUS

Since the United States first began thinking about international law and cyberspace in the 1990s, it has been clear to us that international law applies to what States do in cyberspace, just as it …

templelawreview.org

EU releases common position on the application of IL to cyber - pretty consistent w/ EU member state positions, including (a) sov'ty & (b) due dilligence are discrete rules of IL in cyber contexts. Interestingly though, suggests existing IL is "fit for purposes" to the digital environment?

Cyberspace: Council approves declaration on a common understanding of application of international law to cyberspace

Council approves Declaration on a common understanding of application of international law to cyberspace.

consilium.europa.eu

Building on its success with the UN cybercrime convention, it sure looks like Russia is building a coalition for a cybersecurity treaty and/or reviving the idea of assigning internet governance to the ITU ... instead of ignoring this possibility, perhaps Western states need a counter-narrative?

Russia-Africa foreign ministers call for fair cyber security system

The ministers are attending the first ministerial conference in Sochi, Russia.

the-star.co.ke

With thanks to VJIL Online, I'm pleased to have a new (& short!) paper on how int'l lawyers must do more to engage w/the concept of agreement as a precursor to new efforts to identify & differentiate treaties & political commitments - check it out on SSRN:

Delimiting "Agreements" for International Law

Agreements are central to many international law projects, including both treaty-making and the (rising) use of non-binding agreements. Yet, for all the attenti

papers.ssrn.com

A reminder there's still time to register! Come for recommendations on nat'l statements, multistakeholder participation, & civilian data in armed conflicts. Stay for panel + Q&A including Singapore's Sithuraj Ponraj, Chatham House's Talita Dias, OAS's Kerry-Ann (Mason) Barrett & Sheetal Kumar

Duncan Hollis@duncanhollis.bsky.social · 3y ago

So pleased to have worked on behalf of TempleiLIT w/ Microsoft & Mexico's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on a 3-part multistakeholder compendium project on the applicability of int law to cyberspace. The launch event for the compendium is Dec 11th at 1:30 pm EST. Interested? Sign up at the link below!