Edmund Chattoe-Brown

@edmundcb.bsky.social

Agent-Based Modeller and sociologist/social scientist, research in Social Networks, Decision Making, social evolution, opinion change, incompetence, participant research in secondhand markets, loves weird books and music. Unfollows marketers.

Finally read an urban legends book (Baby Train by Van Brunvand.) Do people still hear these? I don't think I have ever heard _any_ of them told in earnest. Do individual urban legends die out through "innoculation?" Could this style of tale telling being dying out generally for the same reason?

Sadly what AI is not doing is helping social media posters check posts. Have just seen an argument that Denmark is happier than UK because it has less raw count billionaires. (2 stats fails!) The plot of "per million population" across many more countries via Google AI is virtually flat however.

If you do a general literature review (rather than one specifically for #abm) it is striking how much empirical research is about different kinds of "dots" (people en masse, famous people as individuals, places, institutions/organisations, objects.) Should the job of #abm be to _join_ these dots?

Beward: Outcome that makes you worry about the robustness of an accreditation process. A gold TEF award for a university with teaching in perpetual chaos. The lecturing of some academics with very high level HEA Fellowships.

Is there a risk of adverse selection in HE? Staff who are most comfortable with the "flexibility" required to hit arbitrary retention (for example) targets will be those least wedded to the idea of evidence based argument. 2+2 still doesn't equal 5 no matter how many extra UGs that would bring.

Too much HE erases what it is reasonable to expect students to manage. So having explained referencing and given a link to our uni format do we have to let them off plagiarism/Poor Academic Practice because they have decided unilaterally to render quoted text in italic without any quotation marks?

So this morning what price all that self serving socials tosh about "Kemi is looking more and more like the new Churchill/Thatcher/Marilyn Monroe?" According to the voters she isn't even the new Ed Davey or Zack Polanski let alone Nigel Farage.

I am consistently surprised at how little time/emphasis academics want to put on their results. I suppose we cannot blame weaker students for writing a whole essay critique of an article without ever making clear what it purported to show.

I don't think it is terribly feasible but I would love to spot interview students who query their marks. On what basis (if any) do they do this? Has it worked previously? Are the aware of the procedural fairness built into marking processes?

Is there research on the equity implications of shrinking sectors? If some universities are maintaining quality and most of them aren't will the smaller sector "follow the quality" or just collapse in toto? What assumptions need to hold about training and hiring if only good actors are to persist?

One gets a powerful sense, reading student essays in bulk, that few have realised that writing is substantially about the "other" not the "self": Not what I want to tell but what you may wish or need to hear. One can't help seeing echoes of social media (and lack of quality print reading) in this.

Possible tell for HE dumbing down. Teaching staff have to learn schemas, typologies and so on (of unclear value) so that they can mark assignments rather than using domain knowledge of, say, research methods or inequality. Takes longer too if there was never any practical incentive to learn these.

Just in the last three weeks I have heard of three very different UK charities on the verge of shutting up shop. Does someone in the media need to notice this as a possible wider phenomenon? Or is it just a glitch in my information flow?

#abm coding takes such care. You only have to forget that a variable can have a greater value than 1 and "zeroing" it (rather than decrementing it) destroys conservation of what it represents (leading to odd error messages "miles away" from the actual mistake.)

It is clear that many students don't proof read: Author names spelled differently in adjacent sentences, sentences one after another that say virtually the same thing, contradiction. Does this happen because they don't start writing in time or have they never been shown the trick and its benefits?

It is noticeable how many people forget that Donald Trump is a delusional poltroon when what he says becomes a stick to beat Keir Starmer with. Personally if I found I shared a view with DT I would re-examine it _very_ carefully.

How much do literature reviews sin by omission? Doing a LR on a not wildly abstruse topic but a significant fraction of what I am finding is a) non English, b) quite difficult to access or c) in some way "broken" (magazine is supposedly available online but all content is not there or not indexed.)