Exeunt

@exeunt.bsky.social

'flat ontology mechanics’ in the Ξthereal forest | researching stateless ledgers & cosmo-localism @pdxCTP | contributor @bridgespacepdx & @PDXDAO

Guattari is important for the moment because his entire ethical paradigm is based on the production of subjectivity. Rather than fetishize that production as a god like gesture, zero to one, he would emphasize lthe banal (or sometimes magical) ways this happens throughout a person’s day and..

Bild

The only way we’re going to survive the new millennium is to accelerate the (un)holy marriage between open source/p2p information exchange and the umwelt enlarging imagination of the counterculture.

Spent the evening revisiting my “Undercapital Redux”, which uses Brian Massumi to identify capital’s “silent partner.” What design possibilities open up once we suppose that there is a generalized value permeating the social field that registers as “nondual experience of possibility”?

I absolutely and urgently recommend that you check the insane final lines of this otherwise very technical and orthodox cognitive science paper https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02688/full

Frontiers | The Computational Boundary of a “Self”: Developmental Bioelectricity Drives Multicellularity and Scale-Free Cognition

All epistemic agents physically consist of parts that must somehow comprise an integrated cognitive self. Biological individuals consist of subunits (organs, cells, molecular networks) that are themselves complex and competent in their own context. How do coherent biological Individuals result from the activity of smaller sub-agents? To understand the evolution and function of metazoan bodies and minds, it is essential to conceptually explore the origin of multicellularity and the scaling of the basal cognition of individual cells into a coherent larger organism. In this paper I synthesize ideas in cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and developmental physiology toward a hypothesis about the origin of Individuality: “Scale-Free Cognition”. I propose a fundamental definition of an Individual based on the ability to pursue goals at an appropriate level of scale and organization, and suggest a formalism for defining and comparing the cognitive capacities of highly diverse types of agents. Any Self is demarcated by a computational surface – the spatio-temporal boundary of events that it can measure, model, and try to affect. This surface sets a functional boundary - a cognitive “light cone” which defines the scale and limits of its cognition. I hypothesize that higher-level goal-directed activity and agency, resulting in larger cognitive boundaries, evolve from the primal homeostatic drive of living things to reduce stress – the difference between current conditions and life-optimal conditions. The mechanisms of developmental bioelectricity - the ability of all cells to form electrical networks that process information - suggests a plausible set of gradual evolutionary steps that naturally lead from physiological homeostasis in single cells to memory, prediction, and ultimately complex cognitive agents, via scale-up of the drive of infotaxis. Recent data on the molecular mechanisms of pre-neural bioelectricity suggest a model of how increasingly sophisticated cognitive functions emerge smoothly from cell-cell communication used to guide embryogenesis and regeneration. This set of hypotheses provides a novel perspective on numerous phenomena, such as cancer, and makes several unique, testable predictions for interdisciplinary research that have implications not only for evolutionary developmental biology but also for biomedicine and perhaps artificial intelligence and exobiology.

frontiersin.org

Note for p.95: death is discovery of body and world as complex rather than simplex. are there like the spiritual traditions say complexes walking the streets? can your body be a ‘democracy of organisms’ *with you*? the riddle of 1 Corinthians 12:12?

Bar escapades… Direct quote from high level chemist in the semiconductor industry on the advancement of AI: “It’s like tik tok to me - let it absorb the world, and if it gets too much, I’ll just kill myself.”

“he comes to believe in the world, which is to say the other world, where we inhabit and maybe even cultivate this absence, this place which shows up here and now, in the sovereign’s space and time, as absence, darkness, death, things which are not.”

‘Starting from a model emphasizing polarities… we have moved toward a vision of interactions pleasurable and dangerous, creatively dynamic and explosively transformative’