Florimond Houssiau

@fhoussiau.bsky.social

i think we should improve society somewhat also on @fhoussiau@mastodon.social (although not much)

Workshop details: 📅 Submission deadline: May 28, 2026 📅 Workshop: August 24, 2026, 9:00 AM–12:00 PM 📍 SOUPS 2026, Hanover, Germany 👉 Submission information: ag2425.github.io/AIG-CSAM-NCI... Co-organized with the amazing Alexandra Gonzales, @mirandawei.bsky.social, and Natalie Grace Brigham.

Community Building for Researchers on Generative AI-Facilitated Image-Based Abuse

A half-day workshop at SOUPS 2026 bringing together researchers on AIG-NCII and AIG-CSAM to explore prevention, detection, and response strategies.

ag2425.github.io

So "lawmakers will outlaw use of 31 meat-related names as part of efforts to help livestock farmers in food supply markets"... just when health, climate & environment scientists are stressing the urgency of helping more livestock farmers OUT of food supply markets? And what a silly, pointless move!

EU agrees to chop meaty names from vegetarian and vegan food products

Lawmakers will ban use of 31 meat-related names as part of efforts to help livestock farmers in food supply markets

theguardian.com

Our new paper demonstrates that removing images of children from training datasets of text-to-image models fails to prevent the misuse of these models to generate child sexual abuse material (AI CSAM). A thread 🧵

BildBild

This is a fucking joke -- you need a paid account to turn off Gemini?? If anything this is the best proof of how deeply unpopular AI is (pay me or you must use the slop machine that costs me billions every year)

A screenshot of Google's Gemini Apps activity settings, where the Turn off button is greyed out. A notification states that "This setting is not currently available for your account type", suggesting that you cannot turn off Gemini on a free account.

i can’t take the hypocrisy in so much western media coverage of israel’s bombing of iran and iran’s retaliation. israel can do whatever it wants and they’ll find a way to legitimize it, but iran is positioned as fundamentally evil and thus deserving of attack and bloodthirsty in its response.

Reading synthetic data papers in healthcare journals is often infuriating as a privacy (ex-)researcher, but I stumbled across one that is really egregious. The authors cite Stadler et al. (the initial work on membership inference attacks on SDG), to (wrongly!) dismiss a SOTA notion of privacy,

A screenshot of the paper, with the following section highlighted:

However, differential privacy has been shown to not fully mitigate the risk of re-identification. Stadler and colleagues have shown that under certain circumstances, neither the original implementation of PrivBayes nor PATEGAN (Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles Generative Adversarial Network) reliably prevents linkage attacks, leaving some samples vulnerable to membership inference attacks.