Footnotes in History

@footnotesinhistory.bsky.social

Historian of Japanese American Life from 1941-1945 🇺🇲 | PNW Native 🌲 | Documentary Maker 📽️ | Perpetually Working on My Book 🗃 | Slava Ukraini! 🇺🇦 Subscribe to my YouTube Channel! youtube.com/@FootnotesInHistory

Another note not found in the article, Pvt. Goe was fined one dollar for the bullet used to shoot Okamoto as it was "unauthorized use of government property." For additional reading on this case and other incidents of homicide at the camps, check out this Densho article. 🗃 #skystorians

Homicide in camp | Densho Encyclopedia

encyclopedia.densho.org

Footnotes in History@footnotesinhistory.bsky.social · 4w ago

#OTD in 1944, Pvt. Bernard Goe, a Tule Lake Army guard who killed Shiochi James Okamoto, is acquitted of manslaughter charges. Goe shot Okamoto after Okamoto refused to show his pass when he returned to camp. Deliberation during the court-martial only took one hour to reach a verdict. 🗃 #skystorians

The Seattle Times, July 7, 1944

As we remember our history, it's important that we plan for the future. Republican commentators, influencers, and politicians have vowed to seek other means of ending birthright citizenship. President Trump has called on Congress to draw up legislation and has pledged his support for such a move. 7/

Bild
Footnotes in History@footnotesinhistory.bsky.social · last mo.

While birthright citizenship survived Regan v. King, the case shows how bigots will use a crisis to attack that right. In their dissensions in Trump v. Barbara, Judges Alito and Thomas complained that children of people from "strategic adversary and enemy" nations were entitled to citizenship. 6/

While birthright citizenship survived Regan v. King, the case shows how bigots will use a crisis to attack that right. In their dissensions in Trump v. Barbara, Judges Alito and Thomas complained that children of people from "strategic adversary and enemy" nations were entitled to citizenship. 6/

BildBildBild
Footnotes in History@footnotesinhistory.bsky.social · last mo.

Called Regan v. King, the case was brought to Federal District Court in June 1942 but was dismissed on July 2. The case was taken to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and was heard on February 19, 1943. The case was quickly dismissed and on May 17, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case. 5/

Called Regan v. King, the case was brought to Federal District Court in June 1942 but was dismissed on July 2. The case was taken to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and was heard on February 19, 1943. The case was quickly dismissed and on May 17, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case. 5/

Bild
Footnotes in History@footnotesinhistory.bsky.social · last mo.

In 1942, during the height of WWII anti-Japanese sentiment, a nativist group called the Native Sons of the Golden West sued to remove Nisei from San Francisco voter rolls. The lawsuit was not solely focused on voting rights as the goal was to overturn Wong Kim Ark and strip Nisei of citizenship. 4/

In 1942, during the height of WWII anti-Japanese sentiment, a nativist group called the Native Sons of the Golden West sued to remove Nisei from San Francisco voter rolls. The lawsuit was not solely focused on voting rights as the goal was to overturn Wong Kim Ark and strip Nisei of citizenship. 4/

Bild
Footnotes in History@footnotesinhistory.bsky.social · last mo.

Then as now, bigoted Americans have resented that all children, regardless of race or any other distinction, have a right to citizenship. While birthright citizenship has survived legal challenges, bigots will always seek to end it. WWII offers a potential path they may take in the near future. 3/

Then as now, bigoted Americans have resented that all children, regardless of race or any other distinction, have a right to citizenship. While birthright citizenship has survived legal challenges, bigots will always seek to end it. WWII offers a potential path they may take in the near future. 3/

Bild
Footnotes in History@footnotesinhistory.bsky.social · last mo.

The birthright clause has been challenged numerous times since the 14th Amendment was ratified. US v. Wong Kim Ark is the most famous example and established a longstanding precedent. While immigrants from places such as China and Japan were barred from citizenship, their children had that right. 2/