For Professors × Professors

@fpxp.io

Tools and peer-reviewed teaching resources, by and for faculty. We write when there is something worth reading. The newsletter: fpxp.io/newsletter

You built the rubric. You rebuilt it the following year. Not because the first one was bad. Because there was no infrastructure for it to stay anywhere. That is the specific gap fp×p is designed to close. Faculty-verified teaching materials that travel between classrooms. fpxp.io

One line that changes every recommendation request: "If your schedule doesn't allow a strong letter, I'd rather know now than receive a hesitant one." That sentence alone improves the outcome. Give the writer the graceful out.

Three minutes per lecture, compounded across a semester, is time for an extra worked example every week. Three slide types that cost that time without adding learning: recap slides, citation walls, decorative images. Cut three this week. Notice the difference at the next exam.

A tenure reviewer outside your subfield should be able to predict your outcome from the file alone. Most files can't pass that test. The work is there. The structure doesn't surface it.

Most faculty inboxes by week three tell the same story. Due dates. Late policy. Where files live. How drops work. One email, sent Sunday before classes start, surfaces all of it before the semester begins. Template in the reel.

80% of your feedback is rewritten 80% of the time. Build a template bank once (one afternoon), use it forever: 1. Identify your 15–25 unique feedback patterns 2. Write each in full and polished 3. Paste into a template (Doc, Notion, whatever) 4. Copy-paste + one custom line per student…

Bild

80% of grade disputes start with an ambiguous rubric. Here's the checklist: 1. Rubric wording matches assignment wording exactly 2. Point values visible before submission 3. Scaled criteria with descriptions for each level 4. Rubric accounts for 100% of grade (no hidden criteria) 5. Sample A…

Bild

You built the rubric. You rebuilt it the following year. Not because the first one was bad. Because there was no infrastructure for it to stay anywhere. That is the specific gap fp×p is designed to close. Faculty-verified teaching materials that travel between classrooms. fpxp.io

Where do you draw the line between AI assistance and AI substitution in your own work? Most faculty have a clear intuition. Very few can articulate the principle underneath it. The Hidden Cognitive Economy of AI. fpxp.io

The first transaction isn't a sale. It's a trust test. Three things lower the barrier for first-time contributors: transparent review criteria, early private feedback, and acknowledging what it costs to share work you built. https://www.fpxp.io/blog/building-trust-with-first-time-contributors