fredleept

@fredleept.bsky.social

Political Science & Asian/Asian American Studies, UConn, studying Asian American political thought & East Asian science fiction. https://linktr.ee/fredleept

Our symposium on the life and work of Kirstie McClure is now open access at _Philosophy and Global Affairs_. Thanks to Jane Gordon, Lewis Gordon, Kye Barker, Arash Davari, and Megan Gallagher for bringing this writing into print (link in first comment).

Bild

BREAKING: New York City reports the lowest levels of shootings, shooting victims, and murders ever recorded for the first two months of a year. Major crime is down nearly 8% citywide, burglary hit a record low, and retail theft dropped 25%

BildBild

I remember a fellow grad student once said: I read Kant to learn how to think. But reading Kant is only training in thinking like a German idealist. It is no special training for thinking as such because there is no such training.

The great advantage of "desire" as an explanation is that desires seem _determinate_: we can't help what we desire; what we desire identifies us. The great disadvantage, though, is that desires seem _opaque_: we don't know what we desire; we might not even want to know.

Every attempt to use brutal violence to enforce USD hegemony over actual defectors increases the incentive of potential defectors to reduce their dependence on the USD.

We're talking Democrat vs Republican ("polarization") the same way one might ask which faction of eunichs is going to save the empire. What we actually need to confront and deal with is -system collapse- ("institutional decay").

Asian Americans don't want "representation." We want to build a culture, perspective, and "identity" of our own and some of us haven't figured out a better way to say it yet.

The "academics are radical" myth is a right wing strategy for labeling progressive neoliberalism, the dominant academic ideology, as "radicalism." It's an excuse for destroying whatever "academic freedom" is left with the destruction of academic tenure.

Being heard of..." is the basic constituent of reputation. A good anonymized and widespread reputation is fame. A good personalized and localized reputation is trustworthiness. Better famous when it comes to "influencing." Better trustworthy when it comes to action.