Friederike Stock

@fstock.bsky.social

PhD student @ Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development | decision-making in online environments

What a great group to be a part of! It was an honour to organise this year’s Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality with @fstock.bsky.social and Inken Siebert. Thank you to all participants and speakers for the inspiring week, and to everyone who worked behind the scenes to make it possible.

Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin)@arc-mpib.bsky.social · last yr.

We wrapped up the 22nd Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality at the Center for Adaptive Rationality at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development (@mpib-berlin.bsky.social). ECRs from around the world joined us to share their insights on rationality, cognition, and decision-making. 1/🧵👇

🏰 PhD position on computational modelling | collective dynamics | cultural evolution 🏰 Get in touch with any questions you might have and join me in beautiful Marburg! stellenangebote.uni-marburg.de/jobposting/c... (Deutsch) stellenangebote.uni-marburg.de/jobposting/3... (English)

Bild
Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛@rmcelreath.bsky.social · 2y ago

My former PhD @dominikdeffner.bsky.social is now a professor and is looking for a PhD student. Know someone who would fit? stellenangebote.uni-marburg.de/jobposting/3...

The newly established research group Computational Modelling of Behaviour is seeking applicants for a PhD position in one of the following research areas: Collective dynamics and cultural evolution, social decision-making, cognitive modeling, Bayesian statistics, causal inference, cross-cultural methods.

Tasks:

    conducting independent research in the group's areas of interest, e. g., interactive group experiments on social dynamics, cognitive or agent-based modeling, analysis of panel data or large cultural datasets, field research, cross-cultural studies
    scientific services in research and teaching
    contributing to the group’s research agenda and contributing to third-party funding applications
    publishing results at scientific conferences and in journals

People in 26 countries prefer more control over their online environment

 In a conjoint study (N = 11,868), we explored preferences for regulating online environments by examining binary choices between different regulation scenarios. Preprint:https://osf.io/preprints/osf/haqu9