Jack Gallant

@gallantlab.org

Cognitive, Systems and Computational Neuroscientist, Professor at UC Berkeley, and lab head. Check out our lab web site http://gallantlab.org For the latest news, publications, brain viewers, code and tutorials, and data.

Our postdoc Dr. Tianjiao Zhang has released "Its Complicated", a great software library that provides infrastructure to implement naturalistic, complex, interactive experiments in game engines. The toolbox supports peripherals and coding game logic for later analysis. gallantlab.org/Its-Complica...

Our bilingualism paper is now published in PNAS. We used fMRI to compare semantic brain representations in English-Chinese bilinguals. Semantic representations are largely shared across languages, but finer-grained differences modulate how meaning is represented. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Bild

We've posted a new fMRI study of semantic relations (has-part, is-a, made-of, etc.), a key aspect of language. We find that relations are represented in the same brain regions as are other semantic concepts, though voxels tend to be selective for only one relation or another. doi.org/10.64898/202...

Bild

Voxelwise Encoding Models do some things differently from other GLM-related methods because the roots of VEM are in neurophysiology, not psychology. This 2006 paper describes system identification for neurophysiology. Change "neurons" to "voxels" and it all still applies. tinyurl.com/wu-etal-2006

(PDF) Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification

PDF | System identification is a growing approach to sensory neurophysiology that facilitates the development of quantitative functional models of... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on...

tinyurl.com

A recent paper made big waves arguing that fMRI data are hopelessly confounded and uninterpretable. But I'm always suspicious of strong claims that go against a large body of well-supported science. This important post by @alexanderhuth.bsky.social suggests that the paper is fundamentally flawed.

Alexander Huth@alexanderhuth.bsky.social · 7mo ago

This paper had a pretty shocking headline result (40% of voxels!), so I dug into it, and I think it is wrong. Essentially: they compare two noisy measures and find that about 40% of voxels have different sign between the two. I think this is just noise!