Greg Shill

@gregshill.com

Professor of Law at Arizona State University • Student of firms, cities & transportation (and Seinfeld) • Papers: ssrn.com/author=887547 • Newsletter: gregshill.substack.com • Cohost, Densely Speaking podcast http://www.denselyspeaking.com/ • gregshill.com

I wonder if Elizabethan (in the sense of Elizabeth II) will become a useful shorthand in the sense of Victorian. She ruled for longer but her reign saw if anything too much change to be descriptive of anything distinct.

I think the conspiracy is comforting to people -- "a few bad guys did this." The reality -- "electeds, planners, and most of the public believed that the car was the future and rail transit was outdated" is actually more unsettling since it raises the question of what we're getting wrong now.

She's talented at making other people's things her thing. Let's go all the way back to early July. The day before Platner dropped out—when her fellow travelers were still trying to shout down his victims by blaming AIPAC—she makes AIPAC the bad guy in her own story *without* accusing them directly.

Bild
Post nicht verfügbar.

*crack open 157-page white paper by impressive group of smart academics on important topic* *ctrl-F for "transportation," the #1 source of GHGs in the US* *find no substantive discussion* *ctrl-F for "bus," "train," and variations* *find no substantive discussion* *close 157-page white paper*

Roosevelt Institute@rooseveltinstitute.org · 6d ago

Climate policy isn't going away because Washington stopped talking about it. Americans are already paying the price through fires, floods, heat, and rising costs. Our new collection asks a different question: what should the next agenda for climate look like post-DOGE and the rollback of the IRA? 🧵

Without looking, by what factor would you expect NYC total metro area unliked transit trips exceed Chicagoland's in a given year? For context, if the number of transit trips were proportional to each metro's population, metro NYC would have a bit more than 2x the trips that Chicagoland does.

Not upzoning near this park is the equivalent of running rail in a highway median. Your design choice effectively sets a glass ceiling on community use/benefit. Highway rail is mostly limited to commuting and the mega park to occasional visits. Go big, people.

Greg Shill@gregshill.com · last wk.

There are historical reasons for siting big parks like Wilson Park in Detroit or Grant Park in Chicago along rivers & lakefronts. But doing so without permitting adjacent intensification of housing consigns them to occasional destination use rather than letting them blossom into everyday amenities.

Ralph Wilson Park in Detroit, with Happy 325th Detroit branding.

To butcher an aphorism, no one ever went broke underestimating the public's willingness to travel for regular activities. Employment and education are the major exceptions; people will travel daily for these. You can't expect people to commute to a park.

Greg Shill@gregshill.com · last wk.

For a local amenity, being scenic isn't enough to trump proximity. A national park in an isolated place will attract "sufficient" visitors—specifically, many unique visitors—but a city park has a different mandate and should generate a lot of regular, repeat visits. You need people living nearby.

There are historical reasons for siting big parks like Wilson Park in Detroit or Grant Park in Chicago along rivers & lakefronts. But doing so without permitting adjacent intensification of housing consigns them to occasional destination use rather than letting them blossom into everyday amenities.

Ralph Wilson Park in Detroit, with Happy 325th Detroit branding.Ralph WIlson park with adjacent, low-intensity land usesGrant Park, bisected by Lake Shore Drive and abutting the overwhelmingly commercial Loop

European cities this century have made tremendous strides on a variety of urbanism dimensions. Is anyone familiar with evidence of how it’s changed the structure and extent of agglomeration? You could look at land prices but it would be more interesting if you could show changes in productivity.

I suppose the hint was in the name all along, but it’s darkly funny that in ~half a century urban planning has gone from an ideal of a central authority prescribing rigid rules to diffuse processes prescribing rigid rules. The democratic deficit not only remains a problem, but is not the only one.

CNBC TV at the gym showing Oracle 5 year CDS. Hard to see this as a bubble in any conventional sense (the typical bubble is when they just show line go up).

Just saw a non-engagement bait post that said you don’t have to spend six figures to get a good car. We live in interesting times.

Good points. 3 quick thoughts, from small to big: 1) Time + money. The implied changes may require a generational investment. 2) Design solutionism. A buddy has an architecture firm and is often engaged post-pandemic on community-building. He has to gingerly explain that design can't fix culture.

Orin Kerr@orinkerr.bsky.social · 2w ago

A lot of law schools wonder how they can create faculty community and encourage faculty gathering in a world where it's so easy to work from home or just work in offices with doors closed. /1