hakwan lau

@hakwan.bsky.social

neuroscientist in Korea (co-director of IBS-CNIR) interested in how neuroimaging (e.g. fMRI or widefield optical imaging) can facilitate closed-loop causal interventions (e.g. neurofeedback, patterned stimulations). https://tinyurl.com/hakwan

Super cool paper here, showing that the cerebellum has a credit assignment mechanism solving the weight transport problem and giving every P-cell the right error signal! But, could the neocortex be the same? Could it possibly be hard-wired like this? I suspect not... Mystery to solve! 🧠📈 🧪

Reza Shadmehr@rezashadmehr.bsky.social · last wk.

If an action results in error, each neuron requires an individualized teaching signal that guides change in its output. This is the credit assignment problem of learning. Are there neurons in the brain that can compute such a sophisticated teaching signal? Yes. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Looking to the brain to improve energy efficiency of AI when we started 3 years ago, i thought if we didn't pull it off in a couple of months, the topic would be soon out of fashion of coz, long distance collab -> we stalled ... but strangely, it isn't totally irrelevant yet. what does this mean?

megan peters 🧠@meganakpeters.bsky.social · 2w ago

I am *thrilled* to share this review in @currentbiology.bsky.social out today, by yours truly, @myoo.bsky.social, @michalk.bsky.social, Taro Toyoizumi, @tyrellturing.bsky.social, @taylorwwebb.bsky.social, & @hakwan.bsky.social www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... 🧵👇

is this controversial? -- people don't go to conferences to learn things. they do but that's not the primary purpose. nor is the primary purpose 'networking'. they go there, for *moral support*. becoz science is not a victory march. to endure it, we need conferences.

calling all researchers who collect data from humans 🧠🧪 we are running a very brief survey (<1 min) about jsPsych, the software ecosystem for browser-based data collection. if you use jsPsych, or if you collect data with any other software, please fill it out at tinyurl.com/jspsych-census!

I am writing on behalf of the leadership of jsPsych, the software ecosystem for browser-based data collection used in experiments and surveys from many labs worldwide.

It has been difficult for us to figure out how widespread jsPsych usage is, because the software is freely available online and we do not collect any information about downloads, users, experiments posted online, etc. While the software has been cited in thousands of articles, jsPsych usage is likely more widespread than those citations imply, because not every project using jsPsych leads to a citation, and because there are also often substantial delays between actual jsPsych usage and a publication. As such, we are conducting a very brief census of jsPsych users.

If you collect data from humans using jsPsych or any other type of software, we would appreciate your filling out a very brief survey (<1 min) at tinyurl.com/jspsych-census. This will help us to understand how many people, labs, and institutions are current or former users of jsPsych, information that will help support the long-term sustainability of the jsPsych ecosystem.

We would also appreciate it if you could circulate this message to your lab, your department listserv, and your collaborators, to help ensure that it reaches as many members of the research community as possible. The survey is being distributed by Josh de Leeuw, Melissa Kline Struhl, and myself. Please contact me (sam@auckland.ac.nz) off-list if you have any questions about it.

incidentally, by *STIPULATING* that consciousness needs both access + phenomenology, it favors exactly the kind of higher-order views that i used to push for. it would render 1st order views (including IIT, & possibly GWT) wrong but no, i don't want to win this way. this is not how definitions work

hakwan lau@hakwan.bsky.social · 4w ago

i have often disagreed w/ both Ian Philips & Ned Block. & of coz, Ian has famously debated w/ Ned on various issues too. but here i completely agree w/ this piece by Ian defending Ned. reasonable voices are growing rare these days in this field.

these days, the best discussions on AI consciousness (to me) are often from NeuroAI / computational neuroscience people, rather than card-carrying consciousness people / philosophers / straight-ahead AI people or may be it is just to say, empirically rigorous people tend to be better theorizers too

Blake Richards@tyrellturing.bsky.social · 4w ago

1/2) Please let's all remember that GWT is a theoy of access consciousness (what is available for verbal reasoning) and not phenomenal consciousness (subjective experience): philpapers.org/rec/BLOOAC Obviously, in this study access consciousness is literally what they test in the LLMs. #NeuroAI 🧪

For a long time I felt like there was a hesitation in neuroscience to ascribe anything like a planning function to the various "replay" events we see in the hippocampus, but I think this is rapidly changing. Here's another new entry in human epilepsy patients: www.nature.com/articles/s41... 🧠📈 🧪

Human hippocampal ripples coordinate planning sequences and compositional representations in neocortex - Nature Neuroscience

Human hippocampal ripples and replay interact with the prefrontal cortex to update mental representations online, letting the brain compositionally combine familiar elements in new ways for flexible p...

nature.com

often when people email me to ask for a pdf of my paper, i just go to the internet & look for the pdf online. i then download it, & send it to them. (i don't save the pdfs of my own papers usually.) i feel that telling them they could have looked online is maybe a bit less friendly. but should i?

for undergrads getting their degrees this Fall: if u're computationally savvy & wants to get into cog neuro -- instead of taking up lab manager / RA positions, why not come to Korea & get a master's degree instead? it will be all paid for w/ stipend, of coz. why would u pay for a master's degree??