RMZ HU

@hu-rmz.bsky.social

Robert K. Merton Centre for Science Studies @humboldtuni.bsky.social https://www.rmz.hu-berlin.de/en/rmz Posts in German and English. Podcast: Science Works https://www.rmz.hu-berlin.de/de/podcast ; https://open.spotify.com/show/2dUjTTUtytDJHWI4skfXDW

Next Wednesday, RMZ members Stephan Gauch, Jacqueline Sachse and Nikita Sorgatz will present "Justifying science in the political arena: How politicians negotiate value of research" 24.06.26, 11 CET, join the discussion in person or via zoom (link on website)! www.rmz.hu-berlin.de...

On 17 June, Sheena Bartscherer will be reporting online on her new project, “Reforming Science”. The project is looking to investigate the different actors who are currently, but also historically advocating for science reforms, how they discuss these matters publicly, ...

Screenshot of the event page

Suse Wollin-Giering and Markus Hoffmann (TU Berlin) will present "Epistemic factors affecting the (dis)continuation of research with missing resources" at our Jour Fixe next week 27.05.26, 11 CET, join the discussion in person or via zoom (link on website)! https://hu.berlin/86369

Next week's lecture is "Scientific professionalism under constraint: Associations, expertise boundaries, and external pressure" by Ayat Mirzaie and Masoumeh Qarakhani (@ruhr-uni-bochum.de; Allameh Tabataba'i University) 29.04.26, 11 CET, join us in person or online!

RMZ Jour Fixe / Scientific professionalism under constraint: Associations, expertise boundaries, and external pressure

Ayat Mirzaie, Masoumeh Qarakhani (Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany; Allameh Tabataba'i University, Iran)

hu.berlin

We're thrilled to share the line-up for our upcoming Jour Fixe. Every other Wednesday at 11am, different scholars present their current work on boundary between science and politics. No registration necessary, join the discussion via zoom or visit us in person! www.rmz.hu-berlin.de...

Poster for you upcoming jour fixe, you can find all the info on the events page linked in the post. If you have any questions, contact us at rmz-koordination@hu-berlin.de

David Schröder & Sheena Bartscherer are hosting their open panel 'Science Unbound' at this year's 4S in Toronto (Canada). Submit your abstract via the website and join the discussion on transdisciplinary reform movements in science and beyond if you're interested! www.4sonline.org/acc...

Tomorrow our colleague Sheena Bartscherer will join the Research Ethics Conversation Series at Trinity College Dublin with her talk "Who decides how Open science should be?". Event starts at 16.00 CET, zoom link upon request (sheena.fee.bartscherer@hu-berlin.de)

Bild

Although we have been a little quiet during the semester break, we are still publishing regularly on our podcast feed. So check out our recent episodes, especially if you are interested in biobanks, the M87* Black Hole or the competing imaginaries of research literature.

Are you a researcher in Berlin? Share your perspective on your work by taking part in the new Berlin Science Survey. Questions on working conditions, Open Science, and knowledge transfer await you. Check your inbox for your personal invitation – or contact us at rmz-berlinsciencesurvey@hu-berlin.de

In our new podcast episode Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri (UCBL, France) and Jie Xu (Wuhan University, China) present their work on early career researchers in China and France. The role of social media in the changing socialization of academics might be especially interesting! blogs.hu-berlin.de/s...

In our new #podcast episode, J. W. Schneider (Aarhus University, DK) speaks about questionable Research Practices, what are they and so should we worry? The talk is based on the article „Is something rotten in the state of Denmark?" journals.plos.org/pl... blogs.hu-berlin.de/s... @ibi-hu.bsky.social

Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research

Questionable research practices (QRP) are believed to be widespread, but empirical assessments are generally restricted to a few types of practices. Furthermore, conceptual confusion is rife with use and prevalence of QRPs often being confused as the same quantity. We present the hitherto most comprehensive study examining QRPs across scholarly fields and knowledge production modes. We survey perception, use, prevalence and predictors of QRPs among 3,402 researchers in Denmark and 1,307 in the UK, USA, Croatia and Austria. Results reveal remarkably similar response patterns among Danish and international respondents (τ = 0.85). Self-reported use indicates whether respondents have used a QRP in recent publications. 9 out of 10 respondents admitted using at least one QRP. Median use is three out of nine QRP items. Self-reported prevalence reflects the frequency of use. On average, prevalence rates were roughly three times lower compared to self-reported use. Findings indicated that the perceived social acceptability of QRPs influenced self-report patterns. Results suggest that most researchers use different types of QRPs within a restricted time period. The prevalence estimates, however, do not suggest outright systematic use of specific QRPs. Perceived pressure was the strongest systemic predictor for prevalence. Conversely, more local attention to research cultures and academic age was negatively related to prevalence. Finally, the personality traits conscientiousness and, to a lesser degree, agreeableness were also inversely associated with self-reported prevalence. Findings suggest that explanations for engagement with QRPs are not only attributable to systemic factors, as hitherto suggested, but a complicated mixture of experience, systemic and individual factors, and motivated reasoning.

journals.plos.org