Ilona Pinter

@ilonapin.bsky.social

Visiting Fellow #ChildPovMig @lse-sticerd-case.bsky.social #FamilyFinances @uofgussp.bsky.social PhD @lsesocialpolicy.bsky.social #childrights #asylum #immigration #NRPF #poverty #inequality Love strangers & islands https://linktr.ee/ypseekingsafety

Tackling racism will benefit us all, from fairer institutions, to more equitable wealth distribution, creating healthy communities where everyone has the ability to prosper. Read the full open letter on our website 🔗

Open letter calling on the Prime Minister to implement a national antiracism strategy

Over 100 organisations are urging the Prime Minister to commit to developing and implementing a cross-governmental anti-racism strategy.

runnymedetrust.org

Good news. But Rayner's point that it is un-British and unfair, as well as economically and politically counterproductive, to change the rules retrospectively applies to other workers on medium- skilled work visas (technicians/chefs/etc) www.thetimes.com/uk/healthcar...

Foreign care workers could be exempt from tough new visa rules

Andy Burnham is considering an exception to Shabana Mahmood’s reforms that increase the timeline for permanent residence from five to 15 years

thetimes.com

A social security take-up strategy would be a game changer for preventing financial insecurity in the UK. Huge potential to reduce the system-wide costs of poverty by ensuring everyone has enough money to live with dignity and begin to save for the future.

Independent Age@independentage.bsky.social · 3w ago

Last week, we took our new research on the benefits of a take-up strategy to Parliament. Through activities and speeches, we highlighted the potentially transformative impact a take-up strategy could have for older people on a low income. www.independentage.org/policy-and-r...

Public First's Andy Harrop, Anna Dixon MP, Independent Age Chief Executive Joanna Elson, Independent Age's Chief of Trustees Richard Anderson and Paula stand in line and smile warmly at the camera.

The problem with this is also that it hurts children disproportionately because unlike adults children will miss out on child benefit which has widest coverage & children more likely to be in poverty than working age adults and pensioners.

Jonathan Portes@jdportes.bsky.social · 3w ago

(3/4) Changing rules/time limits on benefit access ex post is *not* the same thing - we do it all the time (eg my pension age!). That doesn't mean it's a great idea - it will increase poverty, be administratively complex, and various exemptions/workarounds will be needed.

I hadn't noticed until I read @sonial77.bsky.social's substack that the immigration rules changes laid yesterday contain a significant change to the asylum process (despite the explanatory note saying it's "minor"). From 3 August, people can be refused asylum without a substantive interview.

Bild

DfE: Families in England will see the cost of going to school slashed from Sept, as guidance capping costs on branded uniforms is issued & more free breakfast clubs confirmed Parents at 1,400 more schools will save up to £450 through free breakfast clubs from Sept, when more than 2,700 will be live

To handicap them and any family they have here with crippling debts, artificially prolong their temporary status and prevent them becoming citizens, as this Labour government is doing, is morally unforgivable and, ultimately, absolutely terrible social and economic policy as well.

A few token places on safe and legal routes for refugees cannot in any way mitigate or atone for what this government has done and is doing on asylum or immigration policy. A thread trying to be clear-eyed about this.

Of course the Home Office hasn’t produced any impact assessments of these policies as they’re “still in development”. Even though people are already getting 2.5yrs leave and the legislation for bits of it is now going to be scrutinised.

It’s hard enough to run a functioning asylum system, but the package of polices the Government is enacting on the refugee tax, temporary leave and longer settlement means the Home Office will need a whole new system for refugees as well, up to and beyond 20 years after they have been granted.

At the moment, a family of four receiving asylum support is getting about 60% of UC + CB and about 20% of median income, which according to HO protects them from destitution. Will this mean benefit recipients will have some benefits taken away through UC deductions? Suggests they might in EN

Bild

Sounds like asylum destitution test could be used to determine who has to repay in some way; this would be a very low threshold. Might be the first time that the asylum destitution definition and benefits means testing fully collide? (See screenshot below)

I'm very excited to say that my colleagues Helen Connolly and peer researcher Amina will be presenting findings from our London Councils' participatory study on the Needs of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Young People living in London at the @imiscoe.bsky.social conference tomorrow morning!