Sam Nelson

@immlaw.bsky.social

Author of "Immigration Law Explained" https://samsramblingss.substack.com/

Interesting opinion in MULAMA v. Blanche, 6th Circuit 2026. Claims recent changes in the immigration court system render it unconstitutionally biased against immigrants. Raises a due process claim asking for his petition to be heard in an Article III court. Court ducks the issue (not exhausted).

Just happened across Fuentes v. USCIS, (4th Cir. July 24, 2026). Somebody took a shot challenging the ban on SIJS recipients sponsoring a parent. No luck. The statutory language ain't really ambiguous, and the policy, though discriminatory, passes the “rational basis” sniff test. Still … nice try.

Great post from The Asylumist on third-country deportations. "The U.S. is ignoring our own human rights obligations and bribing or intimidating countries into accepting third-country nationals with little assurance that those people will be treated humanely." asylumist.com/2026/07/15/t...

The Escalating Threat of Third Country Deportations

The Trump Administration has dramatically increased the practice of deporting non-citizens to third countries. As of May 2026, more than 21,000 people have been removed to at least 24 different cou…

asylumist.com

Excellent report from the fine folks at bklg on mega masters and in-absentia orders. “Absentia removal orders correspondingly skyrocketed to a record high, with June seeing 53,808 absentia removal orders, a huge 55% increase over May’s 34,725 (itself already a record)” bklg.org/blog/mega-ma...

In June, Mega Master Hearings Spread Nationwide and Absentia Removal Orders Shot to Unprecedented Levels - bklg blog

The immigration court continues to break records for those removed in absentia as June sees a 55% increase from May

bklg.org

Hot take from a correspondent: Under Chevron, courts decided that all the statutes were ambiguous so that they could defer to the agency's interpretation. Now that Chevron is gone, they decide that everything's unambiguous so that they don't have to bother with congressional intent.

Any immigration lawyers out there who have heard of Guatemalan police altering the dates on reports? We've got a client with a timeline problem and the best explanation is that the police are backdating paperwork sloppily. DM me if you have any thoughts. Thanks.

Some of them get it. Three cheers for Judge Vera: A broader point is worth mentioning. The Agency's decision had no patience for the cycle of domestic violence that haunts every page of this lengthy record. But our Circuit has been sensitive to this reality.