IPCP - International Panel on Chemical Pollution

@ipcp.bsky.social

Solving chemical pollution through international scientific collaboration. www.ipcp.ch

We have a new publication. Thanks @dralexford.bsky.social for leading this work!

Prof Alex Ford@dralexford.bsky.social · 11mo ago

New paper from the @ipcp.bsky.social board - Corporate ‘Capture Strategies’ Impacting Human and Ecosystem Health We highlight that capture strategies go beyond regulatory capture to include individuals, organisations, governments and intergovernmental meetings pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...

We are deeply impressed and inspired by the tireless efforts of the Scientists' Coalition. Their unwavering dedication to tackling plastic pollution and ensuring science remains at the heart of global decision-making is nothing short of remarkable. Onwards and upwards!

Scientists' Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty@scientistscoa.bsky.social · last yr.

👩‍🔬👨‍🔬The Scientists' Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty is a global network of independent scientific experts providing input to decision-makers and the public to end #plasticpollution. Follow us and check out our resources to learn more 👇

Over the past few years, our PlastChem team has worked tirelessly to map the chemical complexity of #plastics. Today, we publish the findings in @nature.com. We hope this evidence propels the development of safer plastics to protect human health and environment. 1/4 www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Mapping the chemical complexity of plastics - Nature

An inventory of 16,325 known plastic chemicals, including >4,200 hazardous compounds, supports the development of safer plastics.

nature.com

🌍A global science-policy panel can ✔️ Provide independent, science-based guidance ✔️ Identify emerging chemical threats ✔️ Enable global cooperation on transboundary pollution ✔️ Build trust through transparency and inclusivity We need science, policy, and global coordination to work together. 🌐🧪

To recap: There are 10,000+ PFAS. Some are toxic. They're here forever. They pollute water, air, soils, animals and you. Some linked to diseases inc cancers. So when scientists warn against moves to redefine them, we'd better hope people are listening: www.theguardian.com/environment/...

Scientists warn against attempts to change definition of ‘forever chemicals’

Move to narrow classification of Pfas and weaken regulation is ‘politically and/or economically motivated’

theguardian.com

Check out our statement and if you are a PFAS researcher who agrees, you can sign on here: www.ipcp.ch/news/sign-on...

Sign-on campaign: Scientists’ statement on the chemical definition of PFASs | IPCP

ipcp.ch

Cora Young@svocora.bsky.social · last yr.

There have been arguments to redefine #PFAS that seem to be politically or economically motivated. We (20 scientists with PFAS expertise) argue here that the definition of PFAS should be unambiguous and based on chemical structure. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...