@ironeconomist.bsky.social

With GDP and employment holding up everywhere I don’t think people have fully internalised that a full hiking cycle is now the base case. BOJ, Fed, BoE snd ECB are all going to do 4-6 hikes unless something changes. There is no tension here when GDP keeps surprising up.

Please help, my beloved rates markets, they are very sick. [for those not following, the markets prices in pretty much an entire extra hike into this incipient hiking cycle yesterday as the Middle East continued to devolve and the ECB hiked its inflation forecasts]

We need corporate bond ESG ratings to have a new ‘chance of omnicide’ category so companies whose executives think they might end humanity don’t get treated as sustainable investments.

The ways in which this is wrong are instructive - firstly: super markets did actually pass on the savings, their margins continued to be held down by competitive pressures! Secondly: the savings were modest in the short term as the capex cost wasn’t small!

Rob Delaney@robdelaney.bsky.social · 3d ago

Initially I was frustrated with the rise of self-checkout but I appreciated how stores passed the savings on to me rather than pocket the money, fire armies of workers & make me do a job I suck at. It’s also why I’m optimistic about AI! I have been kicked in the head by several horses.

Reading various sets of mentions on this marriage discourse and it’s making me realise that people don’t seem to know very much at all about the legal advantages of marriage. For example: spousal privilege. You cannot (barring a few exceptions) be forced to testify against your spouse.

Why to all the Yorkshire cricket players keep getting into fights, I wonder idly, leading through this giant report on regional lead poisoning and …. Wow actually it really might be this.

Bild

Man I bet all those arday defenders saying that Cambridge doesn’t have a recruitment problem and hiring and is robust and professional feel stupid now. Another huge grifter discovered! Cambridge’s commitment to torching its reputation is truly unmatched.

Rhys Kaminski-Jones@rhyskamjones.bsky.social · last wk.

According to the FT, Orr is acting as a live-in-landlord-cum-cult-leader to Cambridge students including those under his own supervision, whilst receiving formal complaints about his behaviour, and boasting publicly how the university is a recruiting ground for the party he might be doing crime for

in North Cambridge, and a daughter. The
outbuildings and at least two other flats on the same road, which are owned by the family,
are home to a select group of postgraduate students from a range of faculties including
divinity. In a podcast interview in December 2024, Orr described having “10 students living
with us. They’re mainly PhD students or postdoctoral fellows.” He explained that they
always gather for Sunday lunch and often for dinner. “That’s amazingly stimulating,” he
said. “They’re . . . the cream of their generation in their respective subjects.”
The residents pay rent and do chores. Helen has fashioned a small chapel from a shipping
container, in which she holds morning prayers.

This kind of thing misses the point. We have a housing shortage; therefore land lords have market power because they get to choose between multiple tenants. In such a case surely you will seek the most credit worthy tenants as you don’t want the hassle of non payment.

Olivier Usher@ojusher.com · last wk.

Why should tenants need credit checks? Rent is usually paid in advance. They aren’t taking out debt. The one borrowing is usually the landlord, in taking a deposit. Maybe the landlord should be the one being checked?

A thing people have bad intuitions about is how productivity affects taxes and government budgets. If productivity goes up faster in the private sector than government then to keep the same ration of outputs the government needs more workers.

post malone ergo propter malone@proptermalone.bsky.social · 2w ago

1) this is good and you should read it (and my prior is that Lowrey's book is also good and you should read it, although i haven't yet) 2) administrative burden is the single place I am most optimistic about positive impact from LLMs

What Jonathan says is correct….but dmitry is closer to being right. Total revenue of the sp500 is currently around 20 trillion. So revenue is before costs, and costs are other firms revenue, so at a ten percent margin each of these companies plans to spend more annually than total sp500 sales.

Jonathan Portes@jdportes.bsky.social · 2w ago

First 4 words of @explaintrade.com's post are correct. Which explains the rest - he's confusing revenues with value-added. The sum total of revenues in the economy is far larger than GDP! (eg, Tesco sales are £70+bn, direct contribution to GDP closer to £10bn).

This looks like another massive problem that could easily be solved by the simple expedient of trying a little bit. Don’t even need the post office to do something, cash payments into accounts with this regularity and volume are intrinsically suspicious and should be flagged for review.

Jim Waterson@jim.londoncentric.media · 3w ago

Hahaha fucking helllllllll just read this. So many thoughts. Like “this is how you actually do money laundering, not on Oxford Street” and “British deference to small businesses being honest and taxpaying is the problem”. (Writes a small business owner.) www.theguardian.com/news/ng-inte...

Maybe this is an American/british use thing but champagne socialist has two quite specific connotations beyond being well off and a socialist. Either (1) your all talk and no action, contrasted with the beer socialist or (2) you have wildly unrealistic expectations of what socialism looks like.

Jake (Real)@jakemhs.bsky.social · 3w ago

the thing about "champagne socialists" is that a lot of us know we were extraordinarily lucky due to the circumstances of our birth and want better lives for everyone as a result, I do not understand how this is supposed to be a gotcha