James Brandt

@jamesbrandt.bsky.social

Managing editor @lpeblog.bsky.social. Freelance academic editor. Posting from the land of enchantment.

I mean, read everything Gabe writes, but especially the things he writes for the LPE blog 👀 This piece does an excellent job laying out why we can't just sub in any identity category to Stuart Hall's famous formulation & the stakes of what it means to say something is a mediator of class

LPE Blog@lpeblog.bsky.social · last wk.

Today, @gabrielwinant.bsky.social explains why a clear picture of how age mediates class would reveal not gerontocracy, but capitalism and the fractionated class system it produces.

(Two) weeks in review: Madison Condon and Luke Herrine on the economics that Law & Economics ignores, Jeremy Bearer-Friend and Sarah Polcz on taxing AI equity, Matt Bodie on the persistence of shareholder primacy, and Diana Reddy on theorizing discrimination for the bad jobs economy.

Weekly Roundup: July 24

Madison Condon and Luke Herrine on the economics that Law & Economics ignores, Jeremy Bearer-Friend and Sarah Polcz on why we should tax AI equity, Matt Bodie on the persistence of shareholder primacy...

lpeproject.org

Today, @matthewtbodie.bsky.social welcomes the appearance of a kinder, gentler, more ecumenical version of law and economics. Yet in corporate law scholarship, where shareholder primacy still reigns supreme, he finds scant evidence of any such shift.

Twilight of the Gods

Contemporary proponents of law and economics claim to have abandoned the idea that law is an instrument for maximizing economic efficiency and wealth. Corporate law scholars haven't yet heard the good...

lpeproject.org

I really enjoyed working on this piece with Luke (from whom I learned so much!) responding to a Law and Economics UChicago symposium that I thought was pretty rudely dismissive of the work done by Law and Political Economy scholars

Luke Herrine@lookheron.bsky.social · 3w ago

As promised, @madisoncondon.bsky.social and I have an essay on how L&E scholars ignore LPE’s uses of non-neoclassical economics and then criticize LPE-ers for not knowing economics. In the spirit of better debate, we canvass some of that literature lpeproject.org/blog/the-eco...

really think that if democrats hold any chamber of congress next year that a condition of passing a budget is the removal of russ vought, who has a genuinely tyrannical vision of presidential power and is a focal point of the lawlessness of the trump administration

Phil Rocco@philiprocco.bsky.social · 4w ago

I don’t think people really understand how bad the OMB proposed rule is going to be for state and local govt. We’re talking about putting a full third of state budgets under the explicit control of Russ Vought. (1/2) www.bondbuyer.com/news/cities-...

The week in review: Jeff Gordon on anti-entrenchment industrial policy, M. Sandhu against legislative primacy, Aslı Bâli on *The Constitutional Bind* during the interregnum, and R.H. Lossin on early-20th-century criminal syndicalism laws. Plus, new CFPs, jobs, and articles from around the web!

Weekly Roundup: July 10

Fifteen of our favorite films on law and political economy, Jeff Gordon proposes an anti-entrenchment industrial policy, M. Sandhu makes the case against legislative primacy, Aslı Bâli revisits The…

lpeproject.org

Today, R.H Lossin explains how early-20th-century criminal syndicalism laws invoked "sabotage" and property protection to criminalize the IWW's speech and organizing — a formula for anti-left repression that remains widely appealing.

Property, Sabotage, and the Origins of Anti-Left Repression

Between 1917 and 1921, twenty-one states passed anti-criminal syndicalism laws. These laws, which were intended to help eliminate the Industrial Workers of the World, have largely faded from public…

lpeproject.org