James Mackay

@jamesmackaycyp.bsky.social

Associate Professor of Literature and Digital Cultures. European University Cyprus. GenAI-curious.

"AI is an automated amplifier of social norms and assumptions" - well put by Selena Savić, speaking at "Rethinking the Inevitability of AI" conference today. Such a productive series of talks.

Fascinating. “Given the general sentiment about AI, scraping the web for content and the disintermediating of content creators, it’s not hard to imagine enterprising individuals adding ‘David Mayer’ …to their own content or website in an effort to make it disappear from ChatGPT’s output.” 👀

The Curious Case of David Mayer, the man ChatGPT cannot name.

ChatGPT users have noticed a curious behavior: It refuses to talk about a 'David Mayer'. We have the explanation and point out less obvious implications.

centreforaileadership.org

This isn't true. In fact, only the part of the Internet curated by algorithm will fill up w/ slop. Human curated databases (libraries) are just fine, and still full of wonderful art. It's just that we've all got so used to having a machine do our thinking for us, and now we need #criticalAI skills.

Anthony Oliveira@meakoopa.bsky.social · 2y ago

you know, let me tell you at the vanguard of this sort of thing: the place where AI is just OBLITERATING public resources and cultural history is in Christian art it's becoming impossible to search and access artistic representations of biblical scenes that aren't slop

"Not a single Whitehall department has registered the use of AI systems since the government said it would become mandatory, prompting warnings that the public sector is “flying blind” about the deployment of algorithmic technology affecting millions of lives." www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

UK government failing to list use of AI on mandatory register

Technology secretary admits government departments are not being transparent over way they use AI and algorithms

theguardian.com

A huge number of my followers describe themselves as AI artists and/or have feeds mostly filed with #AIart generated pictures. I would love to hear from any of you about what you find creatively satisfying about #GenAI art. Why do you enjoy doing this?

The #AI feed - roughly 1/3rd entrepreneurs pitching some kind of tool with wild overpromises, 1/3rd academics/commentators saying "read my article please", and 1/3rd people showing off dodgy/exploitative softcore images they've made with GenAI. Pretty accurate reflection of the conversation, then.

People can't reliably detect academic abstracts generated by AI. But of course: abstracts are written to a formula, AI does formulaic writing well, as everywhere AI replaces drudge work. Wake me up when it writes the article (inc research) undetectably. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing

There has been considerable intrigue surrounding the use of Large Language Model powered AI chatbots such as ChatGPT in research, educational contexts…

sciencedirect.com

Testing out the new ChatGPT-o1 preview, and am finding its supposedly enhanced reasoning facilities extremely funny. Although the conversation has mostly been about maths, I'm looking at it for literary analysis/creative writing. It's barely changed from 4, but there is 1 v funny difference.