Javeed Sukhera MD PhD

@javeedsukhera.bsky.social

Physician. Educator. #MedEd Scientist. Views personal. 🇨🇦 in 🇺🇸.

We often stratify into a hierarchy of suffering because biomedical thinking valorizes objectivity. Yet to the sufferer, the pain is deeply real and therefore legitimate. There is much more to medicine and to healing than what is visible.

Motherhood reminds us that the deepest forms of love are rarely transactional. To nurture is to stay, to soften, to hold, to believe in someone’s becoming without needing credit in return. Today I celebrate that care remains one of the most radical human acts.

Honored to share my letter in Psychiatric Services: “Radical Recovery as a Blueprint for Rebuilding Trust.” Trust cannot be demanded. It has to be earned. Psychiatry must look in the mirror and: Share power. Invite critique. Make accountability visible. doi.org/10.1176/appi...

Radical Recovery as a Blueprint for Rebuilding Trust | Psychiatric Services

PsychiatryOnline.org is the platform for all American Psychiatric Association Publishing journals, DSM, and bestselling textbooks, as well as APA Practice Guidelines, and continuing medical education.

doi.org

I have sat at Seders with colleagues, with patients, and with friends. I have learned about freedom as a practice and what it means to be reminded of how it feels to be a stranger and still move through the world. Wishing chag Pesach sameach to those celebrating.

How do you test whether clinical AI is safe under pressure? Our team used red teaming to stress-test a patient-facing platform and showed that iterative improvements cut high-risk failures. A strong argument for continuous safety testing over one-time validation. doi.org/10.21203/rs....

Structured Red Teaming Improves Safety of a Clinical AI Multi-Agent Platform Under High-Risk Conditions

Artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly used in clinical settings, yet their safety and reliability remain uncertain. We conducted a two-phase stress test using adversarial prompts and ev...

doi.org