Jane Cornwell

@jcornwell123.bsky.social

Senior Lecturer IP Law, University of Edinburgh; former IP lawyer and litigator. All views personal.

👇A quick Friday reminder of the new online home of SCRIPTed, the journal of the @uoelawschool.bsky.social SCRIPT Centre. The archive carries all issues back to the journal's launch over 20 years ago in 2004. Do bear SCRIPTed in mind as a possible home for your next article commentary or book review!

SCRIPTed@scriptedjournal.bsky.social · 6mo ago

🚀 We’ve Moved! SCRIPTed has a new website — refreshed, easier to navigate, and where ALL current and past issues are now hosted. Explore issues, browse articles, and find our full archive in one place. 🌐 Visit now: journals.ed.ac.uk/script-ed #WebsiteLaunch #AcademicJournal #LawTechCommunity

I'm excited to share that I'm writing a book on design law... "Reshaping the ‘informed user’ and ‘overall impression’ in design law: Between fiction and reality" - currently in progress and due to be delivered to Edward Elgar in 2027! 📖

Happy to share details of my latest publication in this month's issue of the EIPR! - J Cornwell, 'Fifteen years from Bellure to SkyKick: the extended functions of a trade mark in EU and UK law', EIPR 2025, 47(8), 461-469

Bild

👇Please share widely - a two-year Teaching and Research Fellow opportunity in the field of AI law and regulation. Details below!

Centre for Technomoral Futures@technomoralfutures.bsky.social · last yr.

@uoelawschool.bsky.social is hiring a Teaching & Research Fellow in AI, Data & the Rule of Law. The post will include: ✨teaching responsibilities @edfuturesinstitute.bsky.social ↔️collaboration across @edinburgh-uni.bsky.social 🤝working closely with our CTMF team! Apply by 2 May ▶️ edin.ac/4ih5dP9

👇 For UK design folks - a fascinating (and troubling) investigation into apparent misuse of the UK registered design system, looking firms that appear to be selling 'authorship' slots on UKRDs to overseas academics, to help those academics game their academic reputations (eg for promotion purposes).

Sarah Fackrell@design-law.bsky.social · last yr.

It's publication day! The final version of our article is now available here: edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....

On 23/102024, the General Court of the EU, for the first time, found a registered EU design consisting of views that are not conclusive invalid. While the result is beyond doubt the standards suggested to be applied are less persuasive as shown in my paper (just accepted).

BildBild

👇Fascinating snapshot views on recent #TMs cases among the audience at IPKat's 'Retromark 2025' event. I'm not surprised by the huge (90%+) support for the EWCA's decision on 'unfair advantage' in Thatchers, but am more surprised by the support for Iconix.... ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/04/retr...

Retromark 2025: Event Report (Part 2 - an interview with you – the audience)

The IPKat blog reports on copyright, patent, trade mark, info-tech and privacy/confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective.

ipkitten.blogspot.com

👇Fascinating test of AI tools answering questions on content from a specific patent law case book: 'We found that a substantial number of responses were unacceptable in the sense of being harmful for learning..., and many more responses failed to fully answer the question or had minor errors...'

Lisa L. Ouellette@patentscholar.bsky.social · last yr.

Just posted a new draft with Amy Motomura, Jason Reinecke & Jonathan Masur: Can AI Hold Office Hours? Feedback welcome and appreciated! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

GenAI tools were given a patent casebook and asked 185 preregistered questions (based on real student Qs & Qs in the casebook); answers were double-coded on 3-level scale. Figure shows percentage of questions in each category that received each quality score for each model. Across all categories, a substantial number of responses were unacceptable in the sense of being harmful for learning (26% for GPT, 14% for Claude, and 31% for NotebookLM), and many more responses failed to fully answer the question or had minor errors (25% for GPT, 31% for Claude, and 32% for NotebookLM).