Jonas Geschke

@jgeschke.bsky.social

University of Bern | biodiversitygovernance.com | RSkeeting biodiversity, wildlife & science-policy stuff | Views are my own.

In this new paper we introduce the idea of "symbolic power" to show how it affects environmental decision making and environmental values. We refer to symbolic power as the ability to influence what people accept as legitimate, credible, or simply as common sense. journals.plos.org/sustainabili...

The role of symbolic power in sustainability transformations

Author summary Sustainability efforts often call for recognising diverse values of nature, such as care, stewardship, and responsibility, yet not all values are equally influential in decision-making....

journals.plos.org

Das klingt spannend. Übermorgen ist aber zu spontan für eine Reise nach Bonn. Kann man sich auch im Laufe des Prozesses/ der Gesprächsreihe noch beteiligen? @idos-research.bsky.social

IDOS_research@idos-research.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Diese erste Session der Gesprächsreihe " #Beyond2030 – ein neues Momentum für die globale #NachhaltigkeitsAgenda“ diskutiert Ursachen der unzureichenden Umsetzung der #Agenda2030 aus struktureller Perspektive. www.linkedin.com/feed/update/... @unrisd.org @globalpolicyforum.bsky.social @unsdsn.org

Completed a review today. And all I got in return was this: Thank you very much for reviewing this paper. Your contribution is much appreciated and central to ensuring that we continue to publish papers of the highest quality. Your professional opinion is well received. Even fits a post here 😅

February issue: A Perspective from Jenny Goldstein and colleagues on environmental data justice frameworks and area-based conservation for addressing biodiversity loss. Readcube: http://dlvr.it/TR1ty3 Weblink: http://dlvr.it/TR1ty4

Environmental data justice is key for developing more effective area-based conservation approaches

Scientists are divided about how to respond to high levels of biodiversity loss. These differences have become clear in recent debates over the role of area-based conservation, which includes protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. Debates between supporters and critics of these measures reflect the views of different epistemic communities who engage with area-based conservation using various methods, framings and normative positions. Conservation scientists emphasize biodiversity protection and habitat integrity; land systems scientists foreground land-use dynamics in interconnected socio-ecological systems; and political ecologists examine power relations and the social implications of protected areas. Despite these emphases differing in focus, they are internally compatible in that they share concerns about both biodiversity loss and social equity, although they assign different weights to these priorities. This Perspective brings together authors representing these three epistemic communities along with a fourth — environmental data justice scholars. We argue that disagreements among conservation scientists, land systems scientists and political ecologists can become constructive by applying vocabularies and frameworks from environmental data justice. Introducing environmental data justice to the debate will help conservation researchers and practitioners to develop more effective interventions to achieve the underlying goals of area-based conservation. Scientists disagree about area-based conservation’s role in addressing biodiversity loss. This Perspective examines how conservation scientists, land systems scientists and political ecologists approach these debates differently and argues that environmental data justice frameworks can bridge epistemic divides, helping researchers to develop more effective and equitable conservation interventions.

dlvr.it

Not long ago accepted by Environmental Policy and Governance: A network approach to support sustainability policy coordination: exploring linkages between biodiversity indicators and Essential Biodiversity Variables 📑 (coming soon)

At #IPBES12, the @ipbes.net Secretariat provides an overview of possible deliverable formats, which differ in terms of author numbers, length, preparation timelines, costs, & finalization procedures Members emphasize the importance of fostering the uptake of #IPBES products

Simone Schiele, IPBES Secretariat, speaking during IPBES 12.
Earth Negotiations Bulletin@enb.iisd.org · 7mo ago

At #IPBES12, delegates are reflecting on additional topics to potentially consider in the context of the @ipbes.net rolling workp rogramme up to 2030, with priority candidates being: pollution; poverty; cities; and climate change

Shizuka Hashimoto, Co-Chair of IPBES' Multidisciplinary Expert Panel.