Jarno N. Alanko

@jnalanko.bsky.social

Postdoc in computer science and bioinformatics at the University of Helsinki. Website: https://jnalanko.net. Various writings in English and Finnish: https://blog.jnalanko.net. Also on Mastodon: https://genomic.social/@jnalanko

This idea of AI filling in results only in the convex hull of known math. I don't know, man. Almost everything new is a recombination of old ideas. For example, given enough time and the right pressures, multicellular life develops from simple molecules. terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/10/08/w...

What should we tell our students?

[This is a guest post by Álvaro Lozano-Robledo. This blog post was initially written in a different file format and converted using AI. — T.] TL;DR: Keep calm and carry on studying math. I wo…

terrytao.wordpress.com

I would have to assume there is currently an army of AI agents at OpenAI and Anthropic working on AI research using massive resources, constrained only by the time to run computational experiments. I would also have to assume they are quite successful at it. And publishing none of it.

Looks like this already came true today? We might have actually overshot: Lance Fortnow wrote in his blog: "Now these proofs haven't been fully verified but if they hold up, we've seen more progress in theoretical computer science in the last 24 hours than in the previous three decades combined!"

OpenAI Math: TCS Selection

lance.fortnow.com

Jarno N. Alanko@jnalanko.bsky.social · 3w ago

It is really starting to feel like at least a decade worth of pure math/TCS results is going to be happening in Q4 2026. Human understanding, digestation and dissemination is going to take a while. But wow.

People say Claude Opus 5.5 is amazing. I find it infuriating. It constantly tries to be one step ahead of me. If I ask for some simple plot, it tries to infer what I *really* want and adds all sorts of things that I never asked for. I does not feel like I'm in charge.

We are often asked whether pangenomes are worth the hassle. The files can be large and methods to explore them are much more challenging than linear references. Earlier this week, we preprinted a clear example of how and why pan-genome graphs are so important for trait discovery.

bioRxiv Genomics@biorxiv-genomic.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Dissecting the regulatory and genomic drivers of the dichogamy determining G-locus in pecan https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.14.725045v1

I'm starting to believe in the labor theory of value for TCS/math papers. That is, given equally skilled workers, with equal tools, and equally important problems, the value of a paper is roughly proportional to the amount of (human) labor that has gone into it.

It is really starting to feel like at least a decade worth of pure math/TCS results is going to be happening in Q4 2026. Human understanding, digestation and dissemination is going to take a while. But wow.

Exciting news regarding the SBWT rust API! We now have an implementation of the subset rank method in this preprint, written Anastasia Diseth. It takes the space down from 5 bits/kmer to 2.5 bits/kmer (double that if both strands are indexed). About 4-5 times slower. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

New Space-Time Tradeoffs for Subset Rank and k-mer Lookup

Given a sequence S of subsets of symbols drawn from an alphabet of size σ , a subset rank query srank( i, c ) asks for the number of subsets before the i th subset that contain the symbol c . It was r...

biorxiv.org

The world’s largest battery-electric aircraft flew for the first time on the 12th of August, a 27-minute test flight over upstate New York that cost about five dollars in electricity. Heart Aerospace’s 30-seat prototype is a big step toward a commercial version. buff.ly/i3f0PhR #ShareGoodNewsToo

The largest all-electric plane ever flew for 27 minutes, on $5 of electricity

Heart's X1 demonstrator flew for 27 minutes from a regional airport in upstate New York, running on battery power the entire time. The aircraft reached 1,100 feet...

techspot.com

This race to be the first to publish an AI-generated result is getting silly. If the answer is just a prompt away for anyone, why should *any* human get credit for it? The value is in the quality of the exposition. Racing to be the first to publish is detrimental to that.

STOC is fighting AI-generated submissions by requiring a proof-of-human 20-30 minute video explaining the work. Seems reasonable to me. Otherwise the PC will drown in submissions.

Lance Fortnow@lance.fortnow.com · 3w ago

STOC call for papers is out. Deadline is November 2. acm-stoc.org/stoc202... New rules for the AI era: limited submissions, public posting and a required video. Is it a coincidence that the camera-ready deadline is April Fools Day?

terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/16/l... >Since research papers are the standard currency in math, a currency that is being rapidly devalued by AI, perhaps we should find ways to inject more humanity into them. For instance, we could add a “backstory” section... Yes!! Do it! Make math human.

Let the Diners Into the Kitchen

[This is a guest post by Noah Giansiracusa. This blog post was initially written in a different file format and converted using AI. — T.] Imagine a tech company announces new robot workers th…

terrytao.wordpress.com

I think that the year of the Linux desktop is finally coming. AI is really good at debugging obscure issues that used to require lots of technical expertise to solve. It already fixed an issue with my Bluetooth headphones, and another one with my USB audio card.