Joe Weaver

@joeeweaver.bsky.social

Assistant Professor in Theoretical Biological (Microbiome) Modelling with the SMART Soils Lab at Durham University https://joeweaver.github.io/

Fighting the devil on my shoulder encouraging me to put this in 'Acknowledgements': "The authors note access to several relevant technical standards was limited by DRM incompatible with the Linux operating system. This represents an avoidable barrier to accessibility and reproducibility."

I recently attended the 3rd meeting of the #Biofilm Regulatory Toolbox EU Cost Action & they let me ramble for 30 minutes about how we can use sandboxes to develop intuition to complement data driven decisions. The idea has held me, ended up writing to think: joeweaver.github.io/blog/play-as...

Play as an Intuition Engine

Anyone who has had a kitten or puppy knows just how energetic and playful they can be. Although this play can be endearingly cute, that is not its purpose. In fact, for their undomesticated cousins, i...

joeweaver.github.io

"Eating my frogs" LIKE A BOSS this morning. I've had a build up of tasks I am tempted to continually put off in lieu of more attractive work. This has nearly lead to at least one issue, so taking Mark Twain's advice "If it's your job to eat a frog, it's best to do it first thing in the morning."

Wrapping up a bit of analysis I don't want hanging over my head during the holidays. I had to go back and verify that some data entry I did was correct. Literally making my list and checking it twice!

Conveying research goals clearly is important; there are common writing 'moves', exemplified here by Girlfriend (Lavigne, 2007). I don't like your girlfriend: clearly state the problem I think you need a new one: propose solution I could be your girlfriend: describe your specific contribution

Settling into Durham University and attending the Biophysical Sciences Institute Winter ECR symposium. Had a peek at the posters, there is some amazing work going on at field intersections.

It's not *the* key to success, but on bit on that key is learning to consistently say to yourself "OK, I'll just work on <thing I've been avoiding but which should be my priority> for 5 minutes before I get tea." 2 hours later...

Question for the meta-analysis and systemic lit review colleagues out there. How do you handle bodies of work coming from problematic publishers - straight up exclusion, evidence weighting?

May the typographers who make fonts with I and 1 indistinguishable and the people who select those fonts as appropriate for a journal have an unpleasant night. Those who make ρ and p too similar, consider yourself on notice.

In my current project, I'm tracking my lower and upper task estimates and qualitative 'uncertainty'. I've been tackling the uncertain tasks as soon as possible and updating the upper/lower bounds. It's very fun watching the overall project upper/lower ETA converge. Did I just become a Bayesian?