Martin does great work, and I love this report, but I really dislike this "novel legal technicality" framing. The government has the burden of proof, and they didn't meet it because the speed cameras had a margin of error that put this guy outside the range for which he was charged. That's it.
A D.C.-based attorney spent three years fighting a $100 ticket he got from a speed camera in the city. He eventually won in D.C.'s highest court on a novel legal technicality, and thousands of other drivers could end up benefitting from it: www.notus.org/metro/dc-law...