Jonathan Jarry

@jonathanjarry.bsky.social

Science communicator with McGill University's Office for Science and Society. Separating sense from nonsense. Not all studies are created equal. McGill.ca/OSS

Ben McKenzie Says Major Streamers Were Scared to License His Anti-Crypto Documentary, So He Found a Different Way to Reach Audiences: Releasing the movie on Eventive, a digital platform that specializes in helping indie films reach an audience. variety.com/2026/film/ne...

Ben McKenzie Says Major Streamers Were Scared to License His Anti-Crypto Documentary, So He Found a Different Way to Reach Audiences

Ben McKenzie, "The O.C." star turned documentarian, is releasing his film about cryptocurrency in a unique way.

variety.com

Where we've been headed for decades: putting the onus of health strictly at the foot of the individual. You died? Well, you had an underlying condition. Why? Because you didn't work out enough/ate poorly/didn't infrared-sauna enough. "Public health" is being turned into an oxymoron.

Max Kennerly@maxkennerly.bsky.social · 2d ago

They think they're being clever eugenicists by saying that people with "underlying health issues" don't matter, but >75% of U.S. adults have a chronic condition (including 60% of age 18–34). So what they're really saying is "nobody matters, it's okay if everybody dies from inadequate regulation."

2022 Slovakian paper on using AI to recognize "abnormal human activities" to "simplify the work of security service." One such behaviour? Begging. "Begging: The videos feature people who annoy or harass surrounding people by begging for asking for money." Tell me science is apolitical, I beg you.

mdpi.com

Someone needs to draw up a graph of personal trust in a new commentator over time. - Discovery: oh wow, they're really good! - A few problematic takes: nobody's perfect! - One massive stupid take: OK, unsubscribing. This person's a moron.

I'm finding this discussion about the potential rights of an artificial intelligence really interesting. Would an AI deserve welfare if it only had AGENCY? What about SENTIENCE? And then what about CONSCIOUSNESS? Where should we draw the line?

Embrace the Void@etvpod.bsky.social · last wk.

New ETV out for everyone! I'm joined by Jeff Sebo for another fun round of "who has moral status?". This time we're talking AI welfare, whether consciousnessness is required for moral status, and why this is a conversation worth having now. Enjoy!

I have a lot of tolerance for academic writing that, out of context, sounds callous, but when you write the following sentence in your paper, I'm gonna raise an eyebrow: "We need a dataset that is divided into 4 classes named Drug Addiction, Autism, Criminalism, and Normal."