Josh Fairfield

@joshfairfield.bsky.social

Legal scholar, tech law nerd, reluctant futurist AI, crypto, digital property & community Prof @ W&L | Author | Testifies sometimes | Consultant Book 3 on the way. Author alignment: Lawful Thoughtful https://joshfairfield.com/

ProPublica just exposed the VA using AI to cancel contracts based on the prompt: “munchable.” Yes, really. -$3k services flagged as $34m waste -No legal standards applied -AI doesn't reason, it predicts, then it scales In theory, AI can do the job. In practice, it doesn’t know what the job is.

Bild

AI handling lawsuits sounds efficient, until your case doesn’t fit the script. Legal disputes need humans who can adapt, not glitch. Sure, a human might get things wrong, but a human won’t forget they're in traffic court and start spouting off about white genocide. #ailaw

In depth: 'World’s first AI law firm' targets high street practices

Garfield Law, a pioneering firm providing legal services through AI, has been approved by the SRA. The founders, a City lawyer and a quantum physicist, are targeting LiPs and high street firms

tinyurl.com

In Ultra Processed People, there’s this line: “Most UPF is not food, Chris. It’s an industrially produced edible substance.” This is AI-generated “speech.” It’s not speech. It’s a processed word product. Know what we’re doing about UPF additives right now? Regulating them. tinyurl.com/y2fv6966

Are Character AI’s chatbots protected speech? One court isn’t sure

A judge is “not prepared” to say companion chatbots should receive First Amendment protection.

theverge.com

In 2015, Erik Luna and I wrote about Digital Innocence; how social media data was being used to convict people, but rarely to exonerate them. It’s 2025. If courts let AI help prosecute, they must also allow it to help defend. We need to talk about *Algorithmic Innocence*. #DigitalEvidence

Overheard: "Someone's belief that a job can be effectively replaced by AI is directly proportional to the distance of that person from the job." Developers think the CEO's job could be automated. CEOs think the sales jobs can be automated. The real answer is AI must facilitate human innovation.

The 👇 recent study showing an LLM “passed” the Turing Test wasn’t the first. But it does show the real problems of scaled social engineering: AI that does not get smarter, but makes us dumber to get past our defenses. (Brief) Thread ⬇️. interestingengineering.com/culture/gpt-...

GPT 4.5 achieves 73% Turing Test success, blurring human-AI lines

Asked to adopt a ‘human-like persona,’ GPT‑4.5 and Meta’s Llama‑3.1‑405B outperformed human participants in a three-party Turing scenario.

interestingengineering.com

March 28, Amazon has removed the ability to tell Alexa to keep voice recordings local. This is terrible design: not needed for AI to get better, not needed to provide the service. The only real reason for it is to listen to things homeowners don't want Alexa to hear. The surveillance is the point.

"There is no meaningful distinction between 'machine speech' and 'human speech.'" Bold paper by Prof. Jess Miers. I disagree. Consider a review. If it is AI generated it doesn't tell you about lived experience with the product. Or a love letter. The AI doesn't love you. #internetlawwip25

AI will always break its own guardrails, unless we understand how its training processes cause it to evolve around constraints. The RoboPair study makes me think cybersecurity is in for a hard decade. Every AI successfully hacked!

I've given talks on reasonable AI regulation on both coasts over the past 48 hours and some of the responses are really telling. East coast: "The market will save us!" West coast: "Technology will save us!" There is a reasonable path between evangelism and luddism, between tech and markets.

Some people not only have something important to say, but say it compulsively clearly. Ada Palmer at #iWORD: the "old fridge" problem means we compare old and broken systems to new and shiny ones. We need to design for when systems inevitably break.

Nick Couldry's book, The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What if it Can't, is out today. This is a sane and necessary read for anyone who wants to see what's gone wrong with the global conversation.