Katie Bergh

@katiebergh.bsky.social

SNAP/WIC/Child Nutrition at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Come for the corgi pictures, stay for the food assistance policy.

Update: We now have data from 22 states showing how many fewer kids are receiving SNAP in the wake of deep cuts enacted last year. In just those 22 states, 1.1 million fewer kids are receiving SNAP. Nationwide, that number likely exceeds 1.5 million kids. www.cbpp.org/research/foo...

SNAP Tracker: People Are Losing Food Assistance as the Harmful 2025 Republican Reconciliation Law Is Implemented

SNAP participation nationwide fell by more than 4.5 million people (nearly 11 percent) between the law’s July 2025 enactment and April 2026, based on the latest month of data.

cbpp.org

The U.S. is undergoing one of the biggest changes to its social safety net in recent history, with huge numbers of people getting dropped from the government’s food assistance program. Nowhere has this been more dramatic than in Arizona. Listen as we explain why and its implications on "The Daily."

Arizona’s Food Stamp Crisis Is Coming for the Rest of the U.S.

The number of people who receive nutrition assistance in Arizona has dropped significantly in a matter of months.

nyti.ms

These are some of the people who have been "moved" off of food assistance in the wake of the Republican reconciliation law's unprecedented SNAP cuts. The immense hardship these families are now facing is not, in fact, "a pretty big win." www.nytimes.com/2026/07/20/u...

In November, no aid arrived. In December, a caseworker said to “hang in there” because renewals were months behind. In January, Ms. McDonald made 100 calls without reaching anyone, she said. In February, she discovered her case had been closed. She had submitted the wrong income statement, she later learned, and the state’s delays left her no time to fix it.

Four months into an appeal, Ms. McDonald, a cancer survivor who weighs 69 pounds, bustles to food banks, stretches ground turkey with oatmeal, and skips meals to feed three teenage boys. But grocery bills have left her behind on the rent, and she describes her worries as a mental tax, paid nightly on her pillow.
Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · yesterday

Rollins: "For those who love work and celebrate work and want people to work and not be on food stamps, it's a pretty big win when we've moved 5 million people off food stamps, y'all."

On top of failing to give states any more time to reduce errors, this means the 1st year of the cost shift will still be based on error rates that reflect: - Unprecedented disruption to SNAP from the government shutdown - USDA's rushed & chaotic implementation of other SNAP cuts

Katie Bergh@katiebergh.bsky.social · 4d ago

This is key: Chair Boozman says this gives "additional time to strengthen administration of SNAP benefits and reduce payment error rates." It does not. The cost shift would still be based on error rates for this fiscal year — so the window to make progress has largely closed.

The timing/sequencing issues with the SNAP cost shift are only one of the worst aspects of the policy design. The second worst aspect is the incentive to drop eligible participants. The first worst aspect is that whole states are going to drop out of the program entirely.

Katie Bergh@katiebergh.bsky.social · 4d ago

This is key: Chair Boozman says this gives "additional time to strengthen administration of SNAP benefits and reduce payment error rates." It does not. The cost shift would still be based on error rates for this fiscal year — so the window to make progress has largely closed.

The SNAP cuts are already causing kids far more harm than most expected, despite Republican claims that kids would be protected. Yet, this proposal uses deeper SNAP cuts down the road to offset the 1-year payment delay even while Rs press for farm relief without offsets.

This is key: Chair Boozman says this gives "additional time to strengthen administration of SNAP benefits and reduce payment error rates." It does not. The cost shift would still be based on error rates for this fiscal year — so the window to make progress has largely closed.

Sharon Parrott@sharonparrott.bsky.social · 4d ago

The proposal includes a one-year delay in states paying the massive SNAP cost shift. It would now begin October 1, 2028. But to be clear: it does not give states any more time to lower the costs they will face by reducing errors, only more time until the bill comes due.

More than 4.5 million people — including at least 1.5 million kids — have already lost access to SNAP in the wake of the deep cuts in last year's reconciliation law. There’s still time to make improvements to this bill & this unfolding hunger crisis demands a stronger response.

Sharon Parrott@sharonparrott.bsky.social · 4d ago

In the face of the child hunger crisis unfolding in plain sight, Chair Boozman’s farm bill proposal falls short on SNAP, despite including a step in the right direction, and further changes are needed before the legislation moves forward.

And here’s the entirely foreseeable result of a law that imposes massive penalties if states give families the wrong amount of SNAP benefits, but no penalties if they make it virtually impossible for eligible families to get benefits in the first place.

But Savaiano says Nebraska DHHS workers more recently started asking for more detailed financial and medical information that he believes has led to unnecessary burdens and loss of food assistance to qualified Nebraskans. 

He said, for example, that some new and renewing SNAP  applicants have had to get signed confirmation from a neighbor about who eats in their household. 

“The state is now requiring verification for absolutely everything,” Savaiano said. 

“It’s making it harder and harder for people to apply and receive SNAP.”
Nebraska Examiner@nebraskaexaminer.com · 2w ago

ICYMI: May through June marked the sharpest single-month participation drop — nearly 6,000 — since at least 2014, says watchdog group Nebraska Appleseed. From Cindy Gonzalez

Hard to explain to people who don't follow SNAP closely that Republicans really wrote a law that gives special treatment to states with the highest SNAP error rates while a state that cut errors in half — and thus no longer qualifies for that carveout — may get hit with a bill for $100 million.

This carveout unfairly penalizes states with better accuracy. In fact, five states — Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York — had error rates above this arbitrary threshold in fiscal year 2024 but are now likely to face enormous penalties. In effect, they were too successful in reducing their error rate, dropping it below the threshold to qualify for this delay — but not enough to avoid the cost shift entirely. New Jersey decreased its error rate by the largest margin of any state, dropping it more than 7 percentage points from 14.33 percent in fiscal year 2024 to 6.86 percent in fiscal year 2025. As a result, New Jersey may now be required to pay 5 percent of benefit costs, effectively punishing the state for making significant improvements in payment accuracy. And it’s a costly punishment: we estimate that New Jersey would owe roughly $100 million, based on benefit issuance in the state over the first six months of fiscal year 2026.

There has (rightly) been a focus on Arizona, which has seen the steepest decline in SNAP participation. But huge drops are happening in other states in the wake of these cuts. From July 2025 to June 2026, SNAP participation fell 21% in Louisiana. 21% in Florida. 20% in Illinois.

SNAP Tracker: People Are Losing Food Assistance as the Harmful 2025 Republican Reconciliation Law Is Implemented

SNAP participation nationwide fell by more than 4.5 million people (nearly 11 percent) between the law’s July 2025 enactment and April 2026, based on the latest month of data.

cbpp.org

Many families losing SNAP, including this one, are losing benefits despite still being eligible. But even if their benefits are eventually restored (again, because they're eligible) going without SNAP for months causes immense hardship. They skip meals. They fall behind on rent.

A low point came when her ex-boyfriend said their daughter complained that Ms. Barroso was not providing adequate food, a complaint she called unfair. Raised in foster care and distrustful of the child welfare system, Ms. Barroso feared the complaint could prompt a punitive investigation. “There were days we had to skip lunch, but we’d never go a day without food,” she said.

After three months her benefits were restored, but the lost aid put her behind on the rent and she is moving in with friends.

As the unprecedented SNAP cuts in last year's reconciliation law have unleashed "bureaucratic chaos," too many eligible low-income families are losing the SNAP benefits they need to afford groceries. The human cost is immense: Skipped meals. Unpaid rent. Constant worry.

In November, no aid arrived. In December, a caseworker said to “hang in there” because renewals were months behind. In January, Ms. McDonald made 100 calls without reaching anyone, she said. In February, she discovered her case had been closed. She had submitted the wrong income statement, she later learned, and the state’s delays left her no time to fix it.

Four months into an appeal, Ms. McDonald, a cancer survivor who weighs 69 pounds, bustles to food banks, stretches ground turkey with oatmeal, and skips meals to feed three teenage boys. But grocery bills have left her behind on the rent, and she describes her worries as a mental tax, paid nightly on her pillow.