Katy Pearce

@katypearce.bsky.social

Associate Prof @uwcomm. I study tech & inequality in 🇦🇲 & 🇦🇿. Posts research & pop culture & parenting. She/her.

When one does a scholarly review and it is clear that at least some of it is fabricated (wo acknowledgement), is it a BAD idea to point out flaws? For example, they didn't report the standard deviations or a particular statistical test wasn't the right choice, and a different one would be better.

Kids were watching the new Danger Mouse on Netflix. So then they stumbled upon the old one. It is super racist. I was trying to think about a term for this - when the revamped version opens up to the problematic old version...

I got my kid a GoPro knock off for his birthday. I'm asking chatgpt to help me make an age appropriate manual. Why does chatgpt think my child is named Jimothy? (Probably because I was asking about making a Jimothy themed cake?)

Bild

Just an FYI to real folks - I seem to be experiencing a bit of a burst of impersonating social media accounts out there. Please be cautious if you get a friend/follow request or message from (fake) me. Sigh.

At kid orthodontist office. They always have a LOUD playlist of tween friendly pop music. I've always been impressed at the list - songs that aren't horribly annoying for adults but aren't explicitly for kids. Today I heard Silk Shiffon on this playlist. Did the algorithm pick up on roller skates?

I have Meta glasses. I rarely use them. But I did use them last weekend to go tide pooling. That is a good use case - videoing cool stuff. But why does my Meta AI app constantly give me misinformation? None of these are true AND no sources either. Wtf? Loosely based on stuff I've done on FB/IG.

BildBildBildBild

I'm reading through this: Müasir Azərbaycan ailəsi: Analitik hesabat (Birinci buraxılış). Bakı: Sosial Tədqiqatlar Mərkəzi. I was intrigued with how Azerbaijanis met their spouse - family/relatives: 53.3%; workplace: 10.1%; school/uni: 9.4%; neighbors: 6.0%; friends: 5.7%; internet: 0.5%.

Bild