Jonas R. Kunst

@kunstjonas.bsky.social

Professor of Communication and Psychology at BI Norwegian Business School and the University of Oslo Past Yale, Harvard, UiB. Editor-in-Chief at Advances.in Father. Views are my own.

We're sharing Arie Perliger's sharp critique of how the political violence research field diagnoses ideological "incoherence"—often missing deeper worldviews. A call for rigorous historical & comparative analysis. https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00059

The erosion of conceptual clarity in the study of political violence

Are extremists really ideologically incoherent? A sharp critique of the 'salad bar of ideologies' and the erosion of clarity in political violence research.

advances.in

Fascinating study on Russian public opinion from August 2022. Researchers caught a rare window for an independent survey before the platform was shut down to academic polling. They found that 69% of respondents construed the war as undermining their social values. A vital look behind the propaganda.

Bild
Advances.in@advances.in · 4mo ago

New article! How do citizens in authoritarian contexts morally construe state actions? @vponizovskiy.bsky.social, @miweissflog.bsky.social, Evgeny Osin, and @grigolus.bsky.social explore how Russians view the war in Ukraine through core values. advances.in/psychology/1...

How exactly does artificial intelligence drive individuals toward violent extremism? ​I am excited to share our recent publication in Personality and Social Psychology Review, "Intelligent Systems, Vulnerable Minds: A Framework for Radicalization to Violence in the Age of AI."

Bild

What really drives someone to support violent extremism? I am thrilled to share our new article published today in PNAS. Together with an incredible team of collaborators, we conducted a preregistered study across 58 countries with over 18,000 participants. This is what we found.

Bild

The distinction between grassroots activism and automated influence is collapsing. We typically worry about "bot farms" or "troll factories." But a distinct, more complex threat is emerging. We call it "Cyborg Propaganda."

The Matrix of Coordinated Influence. Traditional frameworks for analyzing online influence focus on the distinction between human and automated actors (Identity Axis) or between spontaneous and coordinated behavior (Articulation Axis). Bot Nets (top-left) rely on synthetic identities and automated scripts. Troll Farms (bottom-left) use human operators to manage fake personas. Grassroots Action (bottom-right) involves verified citizens sharing self-authored views. Cyborg Propaganda (top-right) represents a new paradigm: verified human users disseminating centrally generated, algorithmically generated narratives, effectively ‘hybridizing’ the authenticity of the grassroots with the scale of the botnet.

Thrilled to announce the Oxford Psychological Networks Summer School (OxPNS)! This is the first-ever psychological network analysis workshop in the UK, to be held in magical Oxford from June 22-26, 2026. To apply and for more information, please visit: oxfordpns.com A brief thread 🧵

Bild

Publication Alert: Deconstructing the "Secure" Narrative of U.S. Democracy Many believe that recent authoritarian rhetoric in the United States is a sudden departure from a historically secure democracy. But has it ever been as stable as we think? advances.in/psychology/1...

Race, memory, and colorblindness: Critical history and deconstructing United States democracy

How colorblind history fuels authoritarianism—and how critical racial memory can build a stronger, more equitable democracy.

advances.in

Resilience or Complacency? While Republicans reported a steady increase in well-being during the start of Trump’s second term, Democrats showed a "rebound" pattern. Does returning to a higher state of well-being provide the strength to persist or reflect complacency? Study link in comments.

Bild

Many D&I strategies fail because they assume a "one size fits all" mindset. New data-driven research identifies 5 different response types to D&I policies: Champions, Reluctants, Ambivalents, Bystanders, and Opponents. Link to paper in comments.

Bild

Are you a Champion, a Bystander, or a Reluctant? Why D&I support isn’t just "For" or "Against." We are excited to publish "Voices behind walking the talk: Quantified qualitative insights on D&I policy support reasoning" in the latest issue of advances.in/psychology. advances.in/psychology/1...

Voices behind walking the talk: Quantified qualitative insights on D&I policy support reasoning

Champions and Bystanders: data-driven profiles explain D&I uptake. Learn the motives behind support, the role of managers, and how to turn intent into action.

advances.in

New in advances.in/psychology: Did the 2024 election break political solidarity? 🗳️💔 A new study explores "stigma-based solidarity betrayal." Black women felt betrayed by Latino men (solidarity violation), White women felt betrayed by White men (relational violation). advances.in/psychology/1...

Stigma-based solidarity betrayal: Implications for resistance to the rise of ethno-nationalism in the U.S.

Betrayal in intergroup alliances: New evidence from 2024 U.S. election shows when solidarity breaks—and why it matters for trust and coalition building.

advances.in