Lance Fortnow

@lance.fortnow.com

Complexity Theorist

Every time there is some new major theorem proved by AI, I start seeing posts that a resolution of P v NP is right around the corner. This is your regular reminder that no, it isn't.

Does it seem like we're seeing an acceleration in new theorems, especially in combinatorics. Some proved by AI, some assisted by AI, some inspired by AI and some by humans trying to prove what they can before AI takes over.

Whenever I typed "y" into any textbox anywhere on my computer, my ChatGPT app would shut down. Turns out the new windows ChatGPT had a Mac shortcut "Command+Y" and the "Command" is ignored in windows. ChatGPT Work found and fixed its own bug, on the third try.

After 20 years, researchers finally have strong evidence that “quantum proofs” are more powerful than ordinary classical ones. The results suggest that at least in computation, there’s no way around the complexity of the quantum world. Read more in @quantamagazine.bsky.social:

Researchers Reveal the Power of ‘Quantum Proofs’ | Quanta Magazine

When checking that solutions to certain problems are correct, it turns out, you can’t get around the inherent complexity of the quantum world.

quantamagazine.org

With Claude Fable only available until July 7 without extra payments, I feel like I have a genie with a limited amount of wishes. Which open problems can I give it with some hope of finding a solution?

Domagoj Bradač gives a tight exponent for the smallest n, such that any graph on n vertices has either a clique of size s or an independent set of size k. For fixed s and large k, n is k^{s-1} up to polylog factors. A major result in Ramsey theory.

Off-diagonal Ramsey numbers

For positive integers $s$ and $k$, the Ramsey number $r(s,k)$ is the minimum integer $n$ such that any graph on $n$ vertices contains a clique of size $s$ or an independent set of size $k$. We...

arxiv.org