Vincent Larivière

@lariviev.bsky.social

Professeur, Vice-recteur assoc. | EBSI-UdeM | Titulaire Chaire UNESCO sur la science ouverte, Co-titulaire Chaire sur la découvrabilité des contenus scientifiques en français | Dir. sc. Érudit | EIC Quantitative Sciences Studies

-> Advancing Diamond : A Portrait 🎥 Last April, “Advancing Diamond” brought together nearly 80 experts in scholarly publishing for two days of friendly and productive discussions. 📌 shorturl.at/oac74

Two new facts stand out: 1. 85% of hallucinated citations in preprints are also in the subsequent journal version (thanks, peer review!) 2. Fake cites more likely to use the names of (male) scholars who are already highly cited, creating a fake-citation Matthew effect. arxiv.org/abs/2605.07723

LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-scale evidence from non-existent citations

Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate plausible but false information across a wide range of contexts, yet the real-world magnitude and consequences of this hallucination problem remain p...

arxiv.org

Well, well. A science publisher (Elsevier) decides to sue an AI firm over copyright infringement. Lawsuit with other publishers (Macmillan, Hachette etc.) vs Meta for training Llama models on copyrighted content, in Common Crawl and then from Sci-Hub among others. www.reuters.com/sustainabili...

Major publishers sue Meta for copyright infringement over AI training

Publishers Elsevier, Cengage, Hachette , Macmillan and McGraw Hill sued Meta Platforms in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday, alleging ​that the tech giant misused their books and journal articles to ...

reuters.com

A high-performing innovation ecosystem is essential to the well-being of all people in Canada. Our newest report details the state of science, technology, and innovation in Canada, including key drivers shaping the ecosystem, and barriers and knowledge gaps. 🧪 go.cca-reports.ca/4jPxfm0

The State of Science, Technology, and Innovation in Canada 2025

Over the last 20 years, the CCA has carried out a series of assessments evaluating...

go.cca-reports.ca

'Such reliance on rankings means that universities are shaped not by the needs of society or by innovations driven from inside the international higher-education community, but by unappointed third-party ranking agencies' @lizziegadd.bsky.social in Nature www.nature.com/articles/d41...

To reform universities, first tackle global rankings

Universities are in thrall to a rankings system that prioritizes narrow aspects of academic life. Three changes would give institutions the freedom to explore fresh ways of working.

nature.com

QSS is now accepting articles that have gone through independent, open peer review via MetaResearch Open Review (MetaROR). The authors of an article on tracking transformative agreements through open metadata shared their experiences using MetaROR's Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) model:

The MetaROR Publish-Review-Curate Model: our experience as authors | Open Science NL

As professionals working in open science and scholarly communication reform, we believe in practicing what we preach. That’s why we recently chose to publish an article using the…

openscience.nl

Wonderful news! Many thanks to @lariviev.bsky.social & all the nearly 5k other organizational & individual signatories of the #DefendResearch Declaration!

#DefendResearch@defendresearch.bsky.social · last yr.

Grateful that @lariviev.bsky.social has signed the Declaration to #DefendResearch Against U.S. Government #Censorship as himself and as the UNESCO Chair on Open Science. Such critical support for raising awareness of what's at stake! @unesco.org #OpenScience #SciSky #Academia defendresearch.org

New from The Strain Team: 🎊 Springer Nature Discovers MDPI 🎊 Springer Nature has spawned a copycat journal series called "Discover" mimicking #MDPI journal titles and citation behaviours. We even made a browser game to prove it (see 🔗). Gross! 😀 1/n #ResearchIntegrity #SciPub #AcademicSky

Spinger Nature Discovers MDPI – The Strain on Scientific Publishing

Home page for the paper ‘The Strain on Scientific Publishing’ by Mark A Hanson, Dan Brockington, Paolo Crosetto and Pablo Gomez Barreiro

the-strain-on-scientific-publishing.github.io