Lasting Learning DFG FOR 5254

@learningfor5254.bsky.social

Account of the 'Lasting Learning DFG FOR 5254' https://t.co/xwZzIaahid

Commentary Scheiter and Renkl (2026) argue that while recent research has identified instructional strategies can support lasting learning, current evidence remains limited in both its theoretical grounding and real-world applicability. Check it out: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

On the challenges of investigating lasting learning: A commentary

This commentary discusses the special issue “Toward lasting learning: Cognitive mechanisms and instructional means to maintain the outcomes of meaning…

sciencedirect.com

Introduction to a special issue. Roelle and Richter (2026) argue that research on lasting learning is surprisingly limited, despite education aiming for knowledge that endures over time 📚. Check it out using the following open access link: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Maintaining the outcomes of meaningful learning: Where are we and where do we need to go? An introduction to the special issue on lasting learning

sciencedirect.com

New study Bali et al. (2026) showed that adding relevant visuals to narrated slides can improve recall but offers little benefit for audio-only content. Check it out using the following open access link: link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Understanding the cognitive cost of multimedia learning: effects of visual load and language proficiency - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Multimedia learning environments require learners to process and integrate information across visual and auditory modalities, often under conditions of limited cognitive capacity. In this study, we examined how visual load (defined as the number of images accompanying audio narration) and individual differences in language proficiency, sustained attention, and working memory influence learning outcomes in international university students. In two experiments (N = 61, M = 21.2 years), we examined how different visual loads affected memory recall. In Experiment 1, participants viewed narrated slides that included varying numbers of images, specifically from 0 to 3 images, and then completed an immediate recall task. In Experiment 2, we compared recall performance for audio-only vs. audio-and-picture information across two visual load conditions (1 vs. 3 images). Results showed that increasing visual support enhanced the learning of audio-and-picture information but had no benefit for audio-only content. Additionally, lower English proficiency and reduced attention were associated with poorer recall, especially under higher visual load. These findings support cognitive load theory and highlight how individual cognitive and language abilities can limit effective multimedia learning. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the design of digital instructional materials tailored for diverse learner populations.

link.springer.com

Insightful study Abel et al. (2024) show that learners underutilize interleaving because they undervalue distinguishing categories and lack knowledge that detecting differences is essential; highlighting both factors increases use. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Interleaved practice in physics benefits from collaboration

Interleaved practice is a desirable difficulty that has been suggested to promote deeper conceptual understanding. However, its effectiveness appears …

sciencedirect.com

Rivers et al. (2026) found that both overt (typed) and covert (mentally generated) prequestions improved test performance, with no reliable differences between the two formats. This finding suggest that covert prequestioning is a time-efficient strategy to support comprehension.

Ritter et al. show that Judgements of Learning (JOLs) can boost future learning, especially when based on partial information. They promote future learning and transfer to new content by triggering covert retrieval processes, independent of feedback. Congratulations!👏 ➡️ doi.org/10.1007/s106...

The Forward Effect of Judgements of Learning on Memory and Transfer in Inductive Learning - Educational Psychology Review

Making judgments of learning (JOLs) can directly affect learning outcomes. The present study investigated whether providing JOLs during inductive learning tasks improves learning of new material (forw...

doi.org

Dobson (2025) showed that teaching students to use retrieval and distributed practice – plus adding pop quizzes – led to big gains in a university course. 🧠 The intervention improved exam scores by about 16%, proving “desirable difficulties” work. #EduSky ➡️ doi.org/10.1152/adva...

Applying retrieval and distributed practices to enhance student learning and achievement in a university course | Advances in Physiology Education | American Physiological Society

Among the “desirable difficulty” (DD) strategies developed by cognitive scientists, retrieval practice and distributed practice are two of the most robust and advantageous. This study evaluated a three-component intervention to enhance student learning that consisted of instruction about the advantages of retrieval and distributed practices, encouragement of independent application of these methods, and the use of pop quizzes to facilitate retrieval and foster distributed studying. Student exam scores were compared in two sections of a university sports nutrition course that differed in only one experimentally relevant way: one received the three-component intervention (DD Strategy Group), whereas the other did not (Control Group). During the DD Strategy Group’s first class meeting, the instructor gave the students a 30-minute tutorial in which he introduced retrieval and distributed practices and then summarized the evidence demonstrating the learning advantages of each. The DD Strategy Group also completed 10 pop retrieval quizzes during the semester, each of which consisted of three to five short-answer questions and took roughly 10 min to complete. A multivariate ANOVA with follow up t tests revealed that the DD Strategy Group outscored the Control Group on course exam 1 (t45 = 2.50, P = 0.02, d = 0.8), exam 2 (t45 = 3.35, P < 0.001, d = 1.0), exam 3 (t45 = 4.38, P < 0.001, d = 1.3), and exam 4 (t45 = 4.33, P < 0.001, d = 1.3). In summary, the DD Strategy improved exam performance by nearly 16%, making it a practical and effective way to enhance student learning. NEW & NOTEWORTHY A three-component strategy that included educating students about the counterintuitive benefits of retrieval and distributed practices, encouraging independent application of these methods, and utilizing pop quizzes to facilitate retrieval and foster distributed studying habits resulted in significant increases in student exam performance in a university course.

doi.org