Lenny van Dyck

@levandyck.bsky.social

PhD candidate in CogCompNeuro at JLU Giessen Exploring brains, minds, and worlds 🧠💭🗺️ https://levandyck.github.io/

While I'm sad to miss #CCN2026, you don't have to miss out on the cool work coming out of the lab. 😊 Super proud of the diversity of projects this year—from category and unit specialization to inversion effects, shape bias, and memorability in brains and DNNs! Stop by and check them out! #NeuroAI

Graphic showing the VCCN Lab’s contributions to CCN 2026. The design features the VCCN Lab logo on the left, a stylized neural network icon in the center, and “CCN 2026” on the right. Five posters are listed, each accompanied by a headshot of the presenting researcher and the scheduled poster session.
Jakob Winkler: Rethinking the inversion effect as a graded phenomenon across object categories (Poster Session A, Tuesday, August 4, 9:30–11:15 am).
Sule Tasliyurt-Celebi: Memorability varies with how visual information is sampled by humans and models (Poster Session C, Wednesday, August 5, 9:30–11:15 am).
Alban Flachot: More shape bias does not mean more human-like visual representations (Poster Session C, Wednesday, August 5, 9:30–11:15 am).
Lenny van Dyck: Different features shape category selectivity in human visual cortex and DNNs (Poster Session F, Thursday, August 6, 1:45–3:30 pm).
Zhengqing Miao: Functionally specialized units reflect readout pathways rather than distinct feature encoding in artificial neural networks (Poster Session F, Thursday, August 6, 1:45–3:30 pm).

Excited to share that our paper is now out in #JNeurosci! We propose a multidimensional framework of high-level visual cortex that reconciles a longstanding debate. Thanks to @kathadobs.bsky.social, @martinhebart.bsky.social, and everyone else for the great discussions along the way. More to come 🧠🌈

Multidimensional feature tuning in category-selective areas of human visual cortex

Two prominent accounts describe the functional organization of human high-level visual cortex. A categorical view emphasizes category-selective areas, while a dimensional view highlights continuous fe...

doi.org

SfN Journals@sfnjournals.bsky.social · 3w ago

#JNeurosci: Using a data-driven analysis of fMRI responses to natural images, @levandyck.bsky.social @martinhebart.bsky.social & @kathadobs.bsky.social identified interpretable dimensions that explain activity in face-, body-, & scene-selective areas https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0038-26.2026

Diagram of brain activation patterns with labels for different stimuli.

Category selectivity vs. behavioral relevance in visual cortex? 👁️🧠 @levandyck.bsky.social and I really enjoyed diving into this piece and appreciated the authors’ thoughtful response. We're curious to see how the field moves forward from here! ➡️

J. Brendan Ritchie@jbrendanritchie.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Our reply to 11 commentaries on our article ("Rethinking category-selectivity in human visual cortex") is out in Cognitive Neuroscience! Thanks to @susanwardle.bsky.social @maryamvaziri.bsky.social Dwight Kravitz @cibaker.bsky.social and all who contributed! 1/x www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

1/7 Can infants recognise the world around them? 👶🧠 As part of the FOUNDCOG project, we scanned 134 awake infants using fMRI. Published today in Nature Neuroscience, our research reveals 2-month-old infants already possess complex visual representations in VVC that align with DNNs.

Human visual cortex representations may be much higher-dimensional than earlier work suggested, but are these higher dimensions of cortical activity actually relevant to behavior? Our new paper tackles this by studying how different people experience the same movies. 🧵 www.cell.com/current-biol...

High-dimensional structure underlying individual differences in naturalistic visual experience

Han and Bonner reveal that individual visual experience arises from high-dimensional neural geometry distributed across multiple representational scales. By characterizing the full dimensional spectru...

cell.com

Our new paper in @sfnjournals.bsky.social shows different neural systems for integrating views into places--PPA integrates views *of* a location (e.g., views of a landmark), while RSC integrates views *from* a location (e.g., views of a panorama). Work by the bluesky-less Linfeng Tony Han.

SfN Journals@sfnjournals.bsky.social · 7mo ago

#JNeurosci: Using fMRI, Han and Epstein explored how people integrate different kinds of views to form mental maps of places, revealing two sets of brain regions involved in integrating views of landmarks into existing mental maps of a virtual city. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0187-25.2025

Y’all are reading this paper in the wrong way. We love to trash dominant hypothesis, but we need to look for evidence against the manifold hypothesis elsewhere: This elegant work doesn't show neural dynamics are high D, nor that we should stop using PCA It’s quite the opposite! (thread)

Dan Levenstein@dlevenstein.bsky.social · 9mo ago

“Our findings challenge the conventional focus on low-dimensional coding subspaces as a sufficient framework for understanding neural computations, demonstrating that dimensions previously considered task-irrelevant and accounting for little variance can have a critical role in driving behavior.”

New preprint out! We propose that action is a key dimension shaping the topographic organization of object categories in lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC)—and test whether standard and topographic neural networks capture this pattern. A thread: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1... 🧵 1/n

Investigating action topography in visual cortex and deep artificial neural networks

High-level visual cortex contains category-selective areas embedded within larger-scale topographic maps like animacy and real-world size. Here, we propose action as a key organizing factor shaping vi...

biorxiv.org