AIM's 2nd round of TTK hiring - building up to 30 - is up! 📅 Ddl 12/22/25 🔬 Accessibility & Learning, plus Sustainability & Social Justice 🧑‍🏫 Associate/Full Prof* 🔗 umd.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/UMCP/j... *Assistant-level candidates: apply to departments, mentioning AIM in a cover letter

LLMs are often used for text annotation, especially in social science. In some cases, this involves placing text items on a scale: eg, 1 for liberal and 9 for conservative There are a few ways to accomplish this task. Which work best? Our new EMNLP paper has some answers🧵 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.00828

🚨 New #EMNLP2025 (main) paper! LLMs often produce inconsistent explanations (62–86%), hurting faithfulness and trust in explainable AI. We introduce PEX consistency, a measure for explanation consistency, and show that optimizing it via DPO improves faithfulness by up to 9.7%.

What should Machine Translation research look like in the age of multilingual LLMs? Here’s one answer from researchers across NLP/MT, Translation Studies, and HCI. "An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine Translation" arxiv.org/abs/2506.13468

An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine Translation

Machine Translation (MT) tools are widely used today, often in contexts where professional translators are not present. Despite progress in MT technology, a gap persists between system development and...

arxiv.org

Do you like trivia? Can you spot when AI is feeding you BS? Or can you make AIs turn themselves inside out? Then on June 14 at College Park (or June 21 online), we have a competition for you.

We introduce a super simple yet effective strategy to improve video-language alignment (+18%): add hallucination correction in your training objective👌 Excited to share our accepted paper at ACL: Can Hallucination Correction Improve Video-language Alignment? Link: arxiv.org/abs/2502.15079

For the ACL ARR review, I’ve heard complaints about the workload—some reviewers have 16 papers. Even though I only need to write 1 rebuttal and respond to 4, it still feels substantial. For those managing more (thank you!), it can be difficult to thoroughly engage with every rebuttal.

There is a new version of the Research Plan for NIST's AI Safety Consortium (AISIC) in response to EOs. I did a diff. Out: safety, responsibility, sociotechnical, fairness, working w fed agencies, authenticating content, watermarking, RN of CBRN, autonomous replication, ctrl of physical systems >

This is my first time serving as an AC for a big conference. Just read this great work by Goyal et al. arxiv.org/abs/2411.11437 I'm optimizing for high coverage and low redundancy—assigning reviewers based on relevant topics or affinity scores alone feels off. Seniority and diversity matter!

Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing

A large host of scientific journals and conferences solicit peer reviews from multiple reviewers for the same submission, aiming to gather a broader range of perspectives and mitigate individual biase...

arxiv.org