Tessera

New data for the 2024-25 school year show routine vaccination rates for kindergarten children continue to decline, while exemptions from school vaccination requirements, particularly non-medical exemptions, have increased. Check out @kff.org's UPDATED brief: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...

Kindergarten Routine Vaccination Rates Continue to Decline | KFF

This issue brief provides an update on the latest trends in kindergarten children's routine vaccination and exemption rates. Over three-quarters (39) of states had measles, mumps, rubella (MMR)vaccina...

kff.org

Larry Levitt @larrylevitt.bsky.social · last yr.

As vaccine skepticism escalates and the number of U.S. measles cases grows, we examine what it means to eliminate measles, whether the current measles outbreak could threaten the country’s measles elimination status, and what losing that status might mean.

Measles Elimination Status: What It Is and How the U.S. Could Lose It | KFF

The United States is at risk of losing its measles elimination status. This post looks at what measles elimination means, how the current measles outbreak threatens this status, and what losing it…

on.kff.org

New: The Republican tax and spending mega-law will cut Medicaid in every state, but the effects are biggest in states that have expanded Medicaid under the ACA. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...

The Senate reconciliation bill would cut federal #Medicaid spending by over $200 billion more than the House bill though the increases vary by state. In 14 states, the Senate bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by at least $5 billion more than the House bill. www.kff.org/quick-take/s...

⚡ KFF’s @liz-williams.bsky.social compares the increases in the federal Medicaid cuts in the Senate-passed reconciliation bill with the House-passed bill across states. #QuickTake on.kff.org/44zOKRr

KFF graphic featuring a quote from Elizabeth Williams, KFF Senior Policy Manager, Program on Medicaid & Uninsured. It says, “All states and the District of Columbia will lose more federal Medicaid funding under the Senate-passed bill than under the House-passed bill. In 14 states, the Senate bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by at least $5 billion more than the House bill would have.”

Heather Saunders @heathersaunders.bsky.social · last yr.

The Senate reconciliation bill would reduce federal #Medicaid spending by $1 trillion over 10 years. Provisions that only apply to ACA expansion states account for $526 billion of the federal spending reductions. NEW @kff.org analysis looks at the impact across states: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...

NEW RURAL BRIEF @kff.org : Senate reconciliation bill would cut federal Medicaid funding in rural areas by $155B—$36B more than the House bill. www.kff.org/policy-watch...

How Might Federal Medicaid Cuts in the Senate-Passed Reconciliation Bill Affect Rural Areas? | KFF

Under the Senate-passed reconciliation bill, federal Medicaid spending in rural areas is estimated to decline by $155 billion, more than in the House-passed bill, and far more than the $50 billion app...

kff.org

Amaya Diana @amayadiana.bsky.social · last yr.

The work requirements proposed in the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” are more stringent than previous policies considered by Congress and implemented at the state level. As the Senate debates the bill, our analysis explains the proposals in the House-passed version.

Work requirements and Medicaid: What’s in the House Reconciliation bill
CBO Estimates: Implementing work requirements would account for the largest share of federal Medicaid savings — and cause the largest increase in the number of people without health insurance.
Verification requirements: States would be required to verify at application and renewal that ACA expansion enrollees meet 80 hours of work activities per month or qualify for an exemption. States could also require more frequent verification.
Implementation timeline: HHS must release guidance by end of 2025, giving states limited time to develop or change implementation plans, protocols, and systems before the Dec. 2026 implementation deadline.
State implementation choices: State choices to impose stricter requirements than the minimum federal requirements — like more frequent verification or longer look-back periods — and state capacity to automate processes will affect how many people could lose coverage.
Comparison to other waivers and proposals: The bill’s work requirement policies are more stringent than past Congressional proposals or state waivers, with no exemptions for older age and more barriers to getting and keeping coverage.

A unique feature of the proposed Medicaid work requirements in the reconciliation bill is that states could choose to require individuals to work for *multiple* months prior to applying for Medicaid - meaning people with employment gaps would not qualify for Medicaid, even if currently working

Image depicts the following text:
Box 1. The impact of choosing different “look-back” periods
John lost his job and was out of work in April and May. In June, he started in a new seasonal position and worked 80 hours during the month. In July, John applies for Medicaid in an expansion state, as he qualifies for Medicaid on the basis of his income.

State A uses a 1-month look-back period when determining compliance with work requirements at application. John would be able to enroll in Medicaid (provided he meets all other program requirements).
State B uses a 3-month look-back period when determining compliance with work requirements at application. John would not qualify for Medicaid, as he was out of work in two of the three months.

Larry Levitt @larrylevitt.bsky.social · last yr.

#Medicaid provisions that only apply to ACA expansion states account for roughly half ($427 billion) of total federal spending cut in the House-passed reconciliation bill and changes in the Senate Finance language would further cut federal spending for expansion states: www.kff.org/policy-watch...

Senate Finance Language Would Further Cut Federal Spending for Medicaid Expansion States | KFF

Prior KFF analysis allocated CBO’s federal Medicaid spending reductions and enrollment losses across the states, and this policy watch builds on that analysis to examine the potential impacts in expan...

kff.org

My annotation of the new distributional analysis from the Congressional Budget Office of the One Big Beautiful Bill. www.cbo.gov/publication/...

As Congress weighs spending cuts and other changes to Medicaid, our latest poll shows three-quarters of MAGA supporters and other Republicans enrolled in Medicaid are worried about the potential impact of federal spending reductions on their families. on.kff.org/4mPUFd9

KFF bar chart titled “Nearly 9 in 10 Medicaid enrollees say they are at least somewhat worried that federal funding cuts to Medicaid would negatively impact their and their families’ access to health care.” The chart shows the percent of Medicaid enrollees — including by party ID — who say that if the federal government significantly reduces its spending on Medicaid, they are very or somewhat worried it would lead to more adults and children becoming uninsured (85% Medicaid enrollees, 91% Democrats, 94% Independents, 69% Republicans); negatively impact hospitals, nursing homes, and other health care providers in your community (85% Medicaid enrollees, 93% Democrats, 96% Independents, 65% Republicans); and negatively impact their or their family’s ability to get and pay for health care (86% Medicaid enrollees, 90% Democrats, 92% Independents, 76% Republicans).

See updated @kff.org state-level analysis of CBO estimates for #Medicaid spending and Medicaid coverage reductions from provisions in the House Passed Reconciliation Bill: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...

Allocating CBO’s Estimates of Federal Medicaid Spending Reductions and Enrollment Loss Across the States | KFF

The Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) latest estimate shows that the One Big Beautiful Bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 and that the Medicaid provisions would increase the number ...

kff.org

Medicaid is the primary payer for maternity care in the U.S. It finances about 4 in 10 (41%) births nationally — nearly half in rural communities (47%). Our new brief covers more facts you may find surprising.

5 Key Facts About Medicaid and Pregnancy | KFF

This brief examines Medicaid’s pregnancy and postpartum coverage and its support for strengthening and improving maternal health outcomes.

kff.org

Medicaid covers 47% of nonelderly adults with opioid use disorder and is the main source of coverage for those receiving treatment services. It covers 56% of those receiving medication and 64% of those getting outpatient treatment and peer support services: on.kff.org/43kNyAB

KFF infographic showing coverage of opioid use disorder treatments among nonelderly adults. It details Medicaid's share compared to other payers in four categories: Adults with OUD (Medicaid 47%, Other 53%), Medication for OUD (Medicaid 56%, Other 44%), Outpatient OUD Treatment (Medicaid 64%, Other 36%), and Peer Support Services for SUD (Medicaid 64%, Other 36%).

From new Medicaid work requirements to lowering expansion match rates for states that use their own funds to cover undocumented immigrants, the reconciliation bill could reshape how states fund and manage #Medicaid. We outline the proposed provisions:

Tracking the Medicaid Provisions in the 2025 Reconciliation Bill | KFF

KFF is tracking the Medicaid provisions in the 2025 federal budget bill, including new Medicaid work and verification requirements and a reduction in the expansion match rate for states that use their...

on.kff.org

With legislative proposals under discussion that would affect the ACA #Medicaid expansion group, new @kff.org analysis looks are some more characteristics of this population. www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...

5 Key Facts About Medicaid Expansion | KFF

This issue brief examines Medicaid expansion enrollment and Medicaid spending in expansion and non-expansion states and describes the characteristics of adults covered by the Medicaid expansion.

kff.org

If states maintained ACA #Medicaid expansion coverage and spending, a per capita cap on the expansion population would erode the effective enhanced federal match rate over time and shift $246B in costs to states over 10 years. More in our NEW @kff.org analysis here: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...

A Medicaid Per Capita Cap on the ACA Expansion Population: State by State Estimates | KFF

This analysis examines the potential impacts on states and Medicaid enrollees of implementing a per capita cap on the federal share of Medicaid spending for the ACA Medicaid expansion population only,...

kff.org

Options under consideration in Congress to reduce #Medicaid spending to help pay for tax cuts could have major implications for children with special health care needs. NEW @kff.org brief explores 5 key facts about children with special health care needs and Medicaid: www.kff.org/medicaid/iss...

5 Key Facts About Children with Special Health Care Needs and Medicaid | KFF

Amid debates about proposed cuts to federal Medicaid spending, this brief analyzes key characteristics of children with special health care needs and explores how Medicaid provides them with coverage.

kff.org

A court overturned key elements of a federal nursing home staffing rule this week: - Have a registered nurse on duty 24/7 - Have at least 3.48 hours per resident day of total nursing care, including 0.55 hours of RN care & 2.45 hours of nurse aide care 🔗: on.kff.org/4lq0ZYc

Large federal spending cuts for #Medicaid could have implications for nursing facilities bc Medicaid covers 63% of nursing home costs. Federal cuts could lead to reductions in Medicaid payment rates making it harder for nursing facilities to bolster staffing to improve the quality of patient care.

KFF@kff.org · last yr.

KFF bar chart showing “For-Profit Nursing Facilities Were the Least Likely to Meet the Requirements in the Now-Overturned Rule.” The chart shows the share of nursing facilities meeting the minimum hours per resident day (HPRD) standards in the final staffing rule by ownership. 79% of all facilities did not meet the HPRD requirements, while 21% did. 88% of for-profit facilities did not meet the HRPD requirements, while 12% did. 53% of non-profit facilities did not meet the HRPD requirements, while 47% did. And 59% of government facilities did not meet the HRPD requirements, while 41% did.

Alice Levy Burns @alicelburns.bsky.social · last yr.

Here’s a short explainer of what the senate budget resolution does and what that could mean for Medicaid: www.kff.org/quick-take/u...

Unreconciled Differences on Medicaid Cuts in House and Senate Budget Reconciliation Plans

The Senate’s budget plan is unusual because it establishes different tracks for reconciliation in each chamber: House committees are instructed to increase deficits by $2.3 trillion, with major cuts t...

kff.org