Luis

@luigidev.bsky.social

29, gaymer, ingeniero informático, webdev, maricón y anticapitalista. Preguntas: https://revospring.net/@LuigiDev Málaga

🦀 rust-lang/rust is adopting an LLM policy > Because Rust governance doesn't work that way. We do not have a benevolent dictator who can say "No LLM-generated content, whether it be code or prose." or "AI is a tool, just like other tools we use" blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/... #rustlang

rust-lang/rust is adopting an LLM policy | Inside Rust Blog

Want to follow along with Rust development? Curious how you might get involved? Take a look!

blog.rust-lang.org

En Reddit he encontrado mi gente tbh. Creo que la principal diferencia entre los que están entusiasmados por la IA en programación y los que no es que a los primeros nunca les gustó realmente programar. Quizás les gustaba poder crear soluciones a sus problemas, pero no les gustaba programar

Now? Man, it's so different. I don't write code manually anymore. I just talk with an AI and it builds everything that we co-designed. Effective? Yes. Is it slop sometimes? Sure, but tbh I don't really care about that. The part I care about is that the intricacy of the art and the excitement I used to have is gone. I don't like programming with an AI. I feel no sense of pride and satisfaction when the job is done. I've gently reviewed the code and cited it for problems, but I feel no personal connection with the product which was built. It doesn't feel like I built this. I don't know where the job I fell in love with went; it feels like I'm doing something else entirely.  I get that people don't care about the code, just that the software works. But I don't know, the current state of things is depressing. I choose this career because I love programming, to me the process of creating something was the satisfying part, more than having the final product. Babysitting a clanker is not what I signed up for

I personally saw a shift in the industry around 2014.

The field got flooded with people without passion for CS and just in for the money, when AI arrived they jumped on it immediately so they could stop coding.

If the field remained a niche like it was in the mid 2000s with only passionate people in it. Things would be a lot different.

España está a una pequeña modificación del Reglamento Electrotécnico de Baja Tensión (REBT-ITC 40) de facilitar sustancialmente estas instalaciones, eliminando la necesidad de que requieran un boletin eléctrico (BIE) Deberian poderse instalar como cualquier electrodoméstico y/o aires acondicionados

OscarMClick@oscarmclick.bsky.social · 2d ago

Nueva Zelanda sigue los pasos de Alemania y legaliza la energía solar ENCHUFABLE / Placas solares en terraza - balcón ☀️⚡ elperiodicodelaenergia.com/nueva-zeland...

Hay un bar que tardas, cronometrado, 1h y media en que te saquen unos bocadillos para cenar pero seguimos viniendo solo porque: - estan buenos, hay que decirlo - no te miran con cara de rancio al atenderte Competencia feroz entre los pequeños negocios

Voy a decir otra cosa: alguien lo tenía que saber. 60.000 personas no se organizan en dos días en grupos privados. Es MUCHA gente. Ha tenido que haber movimientos visibles, en redes y físicamente en Marruecos. Probablemente el CNI también esté en "el que pueda hacer, que haga".

elDiario.es@eldiario.es · 4d ago

ÚLTIMA HORA | Feijóo responsabiliza al Gobierno de la “ocupación” de Ceuta y asegura sin pruebas que “se conocía desde principios de esta semana” www.eldiario.es/politica/fei...

i think microsoft and sony are both nearing the end of their video game making days. and thats ok. people in charge that have no passion for what they make for others shows and we take notice. there have been game makers before and there will be many many game makers long after they are gone.

A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitter’s algorithmic feed significantly shifts people’s political views to the right. Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement. This is one of the most concerning papers I’ve read in awhile.

The political effects of X's feed algorithm
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2
Received: 16 December 2024
Accepted: 4 January 2026
Published online: 18 February 2026
Open access
• Check for updates
Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m
Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects.
Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

Esto sobre una peli que va de un mundo en el que no se pueden mantener relaciones sexuales fuera del matrimonio (excepto un día concreto) porque es ilegal

Straight White Horror is just "what if we were treated the way we treat others?"

⚠️ STRIPE users ⚠️ Stripe is automatically enrolling free users of their fraud protection program into a paid tier. Free users have to manually go into their accounts and change to a "true free" version.

Email from the payment processor Stripe reading: New Stripe Radar plans and pricing	
 
 
 
 
As fraud on the internet has accelerated over the past few years, we've been rapidly adding to Radar, our fraud prevention product. Last year, we blocked $110B in fraud and shipped dozens of new features. With so much new functionality, we're introducing four tiers—Lite, Standard, Plus, and Pro—and updating pricing.Email continued: What this means for you	
 
 
 
 
The version of Radar you've been using is closest to Standard, and you've been receiving it for free. Starting today, you'll receive a free trial of Radar Standard, which now includes broad protection across all payment methods, along with fraud analytics. After the trial ends on January 22, 2027, you'll automatically continue on Radar Standard and be charged $0.05 per screened transaction.	
 
 
 
 
If you prefer to continue receiving fraud protection for free, you can switch to Radar Lite in one click at any time from the Dashboard. Radar Lite provides essential fraud protection for card payments, powered by Stripe's industry-leading AI models trained on more than $1.9T in annual payment volume. Radar Lite will be included at no additional cost with your payment processing.